WNBR 2015

[JammyS]

Originally Posted by yogo

Funk Dooby is hard at work on Flickr uploading 'outtakes' from London and Brighton coverage 2013-2015 in an album called "Unpublished files, volume 2". Over 1100 images to date. Respect!

A very Merry Christmas to you too, Mr Dooby.

[lonemeat]

A couple from a photographer who maintains a very slow trickle of new pictures

[crouch869]

Originally Posted by bb0x6

I found the following by searching Flickr for 'wnbr bristol 2015'.

Here's some more

[crouch869]

some favourites

[trollol61]

flickr.com/photos/150411700@N03/ uploaded a ton of pictures

[crispus]

Originally Posted by trollol61

flickr.com/photos/150411700@N03/ uploaded a ton of pictures

Thanks for that; it should be noted, though, that the 1196 posted (so far) this month include 2009-15 (with the exception of '12), e.g. the '11 below, as well as one set of the Zoo Streak for Tigers...

[lonemeat]

Originally Posted by crispus

Thanks for that; it should be noted, though, that the 1196 posted (so far) this month include 2009-15 (with the exception of '12), e.g. the '11 below, as well as one set of the Zoo Streak for Tigers...

I noticed that set last week (it's now down, unfortunately) and had a question that someone who knows the nuts and bolts of flickr might be able to answer.

Anyway, many of those photos are clearly duplicates of images posted on flickr in the past, down to the same image metadata, but they have different flickr IDs. Especially with images that are a few years old and have been posted many places it can be a challenge to track down if a picture is an original by that photographer or a repost. Any suggestions on how to do this?

[crispus]

Originally Posted by lonemeat

I noticed that set last week (it's now down, unfortunately) and had a question that someone who knows the nuts and bolts of flickr might be able to answer.

Anyway, many of those photos are clearly duplicates of images posted on flickr in the past, down to the same image metadata, but they have different flickr IDs. Especially with images that are a few years old and have been posted many places it can be a challenge to track down if a picture is an original by that photographer or a repost. Any suggestions on how to do this?

A) Most (but perhaps not all) back up now, with some additions in January
B) If the purely numerical portion of the flickr filename is lower in one case, it's older than one with higher-number filename (though of course, a third one with an even-lower-number filename may have existed and subsequently been deleted or made private)
C) The one with biggest size (assuming it hasn't been blown up a la what was once called "digital zoom" - if that's been done, quality will be significantly worse in the larger versions) is usually older

[friez]

Originally Posted by crispus

A) Most (but perhaps not all) back up now, with some additions in January
B) If the purely numerical portion of the flickr filename is lower in one case, it's older than one with higher-number filename (though of course, a third one with an even-lower-number filename may have existed and subsequently been deleted or made private)
C) The one with biggest size (assuming it hasn't been blown up a la what was once called "digital zoom" - if that's been done, quality will be significantly worse in the larger versions) is usually older

Where can I find more of that blonde? Tell me she gets naked!

[c747584@trbvm.com]

Originally Posted by friez

Where can I find more of that blonde? Tell me she gets naked!

That pic is from 2016. She's all over the 2016 thread. Yes, very naked. Cute small breasts, shaved pussy, tiny ass. One example: