One Click Chicks
Our forum has over 13 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!

Go Back   One Click Chicks Forum > General Discussion > Site Feedback & Support
Login
or
Register
Videos FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 04-14-2021, 01:18 AM
thefergieferg1's Avatar
thefergieferg1 thefergieferg1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 546
Thanks: 58,407
Thanked 8,645 Times in 553 Posts
Default Some clarification on Rule 8 please

"All people seen in any photo or video must be at least 18 years old. If you're not sure of someone's age, don't post it."

My understanding is that there has always been zero tolerence on this rule which means no kids in pictures under any circumstances even if they are pixelated or blurred.

FWIW I agree with this completely, - after all this is a porn site.

Lately there seem to be a few creeping in which I have reported but have not been deleted. Maybe my reports have gone AWOL or something, or is there a change in the interpretation of this rule?

Thank You
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thefergieferg1 For This Useful Post:
  #2  
Old 04-16-2021, 08:55 AM
Turtle Turtle is offline
Slow Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,941
Thanks: 6,603
Thanked 152,822 Times in 6,852 Posts
Default

As a mod I'm supposed to know, but to be honest I'm not 100% sure myself.
I've seen pictures get deleted or let go, depending on who gets to it first.
I thought blurring out an underage person was ok, but if too much was in the picture it was deleted anyway.
Just lately I err on the side of caution and delete the image. After all, if it still looks underage, it shouldn't be there.
Reports are dealt with by whoever gets to it first. If a mod lets it go I won't overrule their decision, I'm too far down the food chain to do that.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Turtle For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 04-16-2021, 12:07 PM
thefergieferg1's Avatar
thefergieferg1 thefergieferg1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 546
Thanks: 58,407
Thanked 8,645 Times in 553 Posts
Default

Thanks for your reply. I guessed it was probably something like that, and I'll continue to report any I see just in case.


I know it's a bit of a moral maze discussing porn but I feel this is one area that should be pretty clear for a website.
Apart from anything, it's unecessary because the photo can be usually be cropped to size which I understand is Ok providing it's not to hide a watermark.
Most offending pics seem to be from relatively new users and I like to think that more senior stick to the rule quite strictly.

Perhaps a good opportunity to say a big 'Thanks' to the mods, - not an easy job.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to thefergieferg1 For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 04-16-2021, 12:13 PM
Wetmac's Avatar
Wetmac Wetmac is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,596
Thanks: 595
Thanked 6,674 Times in 948 Posts
Default

Certainly from my point of view I make a judgement call on each image. We've had reports where eg the bottom of a child's leg could just be seen in the corner of the image, in which case I tend to let it slide. The same with voyeur shots where a child's blurry outline can just about be seen with eagle eyes in the far background of a beach shot.

As much as we don't want unsuitable images, we also don't want to annoy those that take the time to upload and give us new content to look at, on the basis of the above scenario.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wetmac For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Beaver Webcams


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.