Fore or against skin

[RMSTITANIC]

Alright guys and gals. I am 52 years old and happily married for the last 30+ years. I was one of the very few who had their foreskin attached in high school as it still is today. As I recall, a high school girlfriend was intrigued with the novelty of something different. When I was sporting a condom, the feeling for her was similar to a circumsized penis as the foreskin was pulled back and the condom rolled on. If the condom was tight, the excessive skin was left back at the end of the condom and either she needed to lubricated or the condom. When we the relationship grew, the condoms were dropped. That felt completely different for me and her. Since the skin on the penis slides up and down several inches, the pleasure both of us were feeling was my inner penis shaft was sliding inside by exterior skin. As the stoking motion happens, there is a delay in the exterior skin sliding after the penis has completed the stroke. That delay drove her to some of her best orgasms (or whatever that was we were doing in high school). You see there was a delay as her sensation of my shaft with all of its inner texturing created an anomaly delay she had never felt before. So if you are interested in circumcising later in life, I would urge you to have intercourse with your mate utilizing a tight condom with the head portion cut off. You have the full sensation of the head of your penis exposed, but the skin motion on your shaft is lost and some form of lubrication is necessary. Then try without the condom. It's a free country so the choice is yours; however, there is no going back. Gals, did I nail it! Pun intended..

[RMSTITANIC]

in and out

[Joe Kuhl]

No man ever thinks his penis is big enough, and that goes double for the man I see in my shaving mirror each morning.

It's a question of logic, then. If you don't think your dick is big enough, why would you choose to cut off a piece and throw it away?