Photos of Naked Charity Calendars

[mrjombi]

My imagination ain't that good! I praise the brave women who go the extra mile to make the calendar extra special. And I curse those ugly huge black panties which must only be sold to women who are about to do a nude charity calendar shoot, because I have yet to see them being worn anywhere else!

Originally Posted by zito34

...no complaints about lack of nudity....these are some pretty ladies....photos are
provocative....if you have to see them totally naked, use your imagination....

[retrac55]

Originally Posted by zito34

...no complaints about lack of nudity....these are some pretty ladies....photos are
provocative....if you have to see them totally naked, use your imagination....

Really? Naked is ALWAYS better. Geezzz heroes here too? Imaginations are for kids with catalogs

[Jairzinhode]

Well, itīs not about complaining and itīs nothing against the poster for sure. Itīs always a good work. But as a matter of fact, if I wanted to use my imagination I wouldnīt need photos at all.
Part of what turns me on is, that the girls have the courage to show their naked bodies to an audience. It doesnīt take much of a courage if they keep their pants on and use handbras. This is going just half the way or not even that.

If they donīt have the guts to go all the way, I donīt give them my attention let alone my money. Thatīs the deal, as simple as that. Nevertheless, respect to anybody who posts any pictures.

Jair

[ECUpirate]

It looks doctored. It could be a tanline, but then the tanline doesn't continue over her hip. There is considerably less grain in the suspect area than even the whitest parts of her body. It looks like it was doctored not with Photoshop but with a bottle of Liquid Paper or White-Out.

[RighteousD]

Originally Posted by Dalquaz

What are opinions about doctoring of the November 2011 Bare To Care image of the girl in the wheelbarrow here?

It looks like they may have used white out over the whole of her triangle area. But it could be that that area just shows up as very white in the image, as parts of her boobs are very white. I'm leaning towards doctored as the area that is very white seems a bit too "clean". Thoughts?

i think she might actually have pants on.

[kingdavid]

I knew hanging around this thread would pay off...wish it was in color and not so grainy...but good job !!


https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...2&d=1300469766

[kingdavid]

that would be great !

[zito34]

[QUOTE=Dalquaz;894682]July: Tennis
August: Athletics
September: Lacrosse
October: Rugby
November: Netball
December: Hockey
January 2012: Snow Sports[/QUOT


.......especially the field hockey team....the short haired blond that is on the back cover, hot!!!

[kingdavid]

"Do you realise how rude your posts sound sometimes? "

no I don't dude...if you want to start an argument here go ahead..I have always been truthful as well as thankful..
to Dalquaz and others for their great work...read my posts.

If you can't lighten up a bit...that's YOUR problem not MINE...cool ??

[kingdavid]

" Not sure if this is all that much better, but here you go. "

yeah nice...the graininess is gone ! Thank you my friend. The girl on the far right has NO butt crack...LOL !!
Great pic though !!