One Click Chicks
Our forum has over 13 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!

Go Back   One Click Chicks Forum > Photos > ENF - Embarrassed Nude Females
Login
or
Register
Videos FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old 10-11-2009, 11:48 PM
vidpro vidpro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 701
Thanks: 896
Thanked 2,817 Times in 366 Posts
Default

After a closer examination, I still maintain that all three images are of the same person.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-11-2009, 11:57 PM
angusniagara's Avatar
angusniagara angusniagara is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 45
Thanks: 15,252
Thanked 706 Times in 31 Posts
Default

I'll accept that picture three is the same person as person one with age progression and makeup. But take a look at the cheek bone structure in picture two. Nose is somewhat different.
With a good theatrical quality make-up kit, I could change the person in pictures one and two into the person in picture two. But if these were all casual pictures, not a covert op, or some other unusual effort at changing appearence, I'd say person two is a different person.
Sorry, I no longer have access to a biometric or Bertillion-type photo analysis program. But I'd guess picture two is somebody else.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-12-2009, 01:48 AM
liberty's Avatar
liberty liberty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 234
Thanks: 5,132
Thanked 3,393 Times in 214 Posts
Default angusniagara has good point...

about the nose that I hadn't noticed before.

In the second pic, the nose is different from the nose of picture one and three. The nose of the second pic girl has a little bit of a flat pushed up nose whereas the nose in picture one and three is rounded full-bodied nose there isn't a flat part to it at all on the tip.

I hope this makes sense to most of you...if I can think of a better way to explain this, I will edit later.

Last edited by liberty; 10-12-2009 at 01:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-12-2009, 08:43 AM
Roswell Crash Survivor Roswell Crash Survivor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 37
Thanks: 108
Thanked 174 Times in 16 Posts
Talking New photographs and metadata extracted

Hey all, good response so far. Some of you are paying a lot of attention to this!

In response to at least 2 claims that known1.jpeg and known2.jpeg are not the same person. I must acknowledge that after reviewing my sources, it is possible that 'known2' may indeed not be the same person as 'known1'.

I have submitted two other photographs for examination, I do however insist the veracity of these are almost beyond reproach. Both are posed shots.

known3 was almost certainly taken in the last 12 months. The image is thumbnail sized and there is no better resolution available.

known4 is from around 2004, is most likely a scanned copy of a printed photograph.

Both are most recent than 'known1' - so if you have to discount a photographs. I'd rather discount known1 in favor of these two new photographs. The age difference in subject between known1 and mysterywoman could lead to incorrect conclusion.

Its not much to work with, but can you folks compare these against mysterywoman please.

I also have another piece of information in the metadata of the mysterywoman file. The original photograph was taken using a 'Concord 2000' camera made by Concord corporation. Is this a make of camera found exclusively in one region of the world? Of course, cameras can be transported internationally too...
Attached Thumbnails
known4.jpg  
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roswell Crash Survivor For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old 10-14-2009, 06:51 AM
Roswell Crash Survivor Roswell Crash Survivor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 37
Thanks: 108
Thanked 174 Times in 16 Posts
Default

New photo, new details and yet no replies.

I stand by my initial promise to post a photo of her with her box fully open, if I can get 15 unique responses.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-14-2009, 07:24 AM
0o9i8u7y 0o9i8u7y is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 158
Thanks: 79
Thanked 173 Times in 41 Posts
Default Looks the same to me

She is wearing makeup in the 2nd pic, and you can't see her ears, but the nose seems to look similar.

Because the lighting, camera quality and stuff is off, hard to be sure
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-14-2009, 03:34 PM
mranand's Avatar
mranand mranand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 243
Thanks: 452
Thanked 2,560 Times in 237 Posts
Default

all are of same girl !!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-14-2009, 08:18 PM
JackRyan JackRyan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Thanks: 646
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Looks like the same girl to me.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-15-2009, 03:33 AM
toybag toybag is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 91 Times in 1 Post
Default

I find it entirely plausible, given the change in lighting, that they could all three be the same person.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-15-2009, 03:40 AM
JohnnyRelentless JohnnyRelentless is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Definitely 3 different women.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Beaver Webcams


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.