2009 Fremont Solstice Parade

[sal32]

dunno how i missed this one

nice view of girl at the rear too

[crispus]

Originally Posted by sal32

...nice view of girl at the rear too

...speaking of whom, the 10th picture in your selection shows her taking off her dress, and more in the set show her in just panties, lending credence to Pedro's theory that it was a spur-of-the-moment decision to join the ride toute nue...

[pennywiseguy2]

Some nice pics here: http://picasaweb.google.com/swildsto...kedBikers2009# Copyrighted, so can't post.

Cheers

pennywiseguy2

[Fred6027]

No , no ! dude - - - I am trying to make your job easier -

AS WE SPEAK ; I am in the process of developing Software that will allow you to run any number of pictures ( single , or batch mode ) .... that will allow you to organize your pics via the " traditional " Hex Code Chart ...

To heck with this " Roy G. Biv " stuff !!!!! ( let Roy take a vacation - to Fremont ! )

I am going to call this program .... um ..... " Hex your Colors " ; ... um ; no ...... " Harry Potter Color Codes " ( um , you know " hex your colors " etc ... )

Well , let's just say that I haven't come up with a name yet ... but look for this to be available in time for the 2011 Parade !!

Once again , I have forgotten what I am talking about - - - so I'll post more pics -

Originally Posted by Klondike

All is not hopeless, Fred. Its really very simple. First - yes, I am chopping up pics to focus on individual riders. No law against that...

Second, my breakdown goes like this:

minimal riders - unpainted or minimally painted (lots of bare skin, ideally distributed evenly over the entire body, but not always).

green riders
red/orange riders
blue riders
purple riders
gold/silver riders (hear that, Pedro - gold is the one you posted)
yellow riders
white riders
black/brown riders

in each of the above cases, those colors predominate and there is not much exposed bare skin.

then we have two additional categories:

multi-colored riders - sort of a catch all where no one color predominates and the paint job does not fall into the next and final category, which is:

clothed/costumed riders - where the paint job is made to resemble clothing or a costume of some sort (i.e. mermaid, viking, tuxedo, skeleton, caveman, etc)

there, thats all there is to it. And yes, I detected a hint of sarcasm/bemusement from you regarding my obsessiveness. Thats OK. I am OK with that. Honest....


KLondike

there -

[stevin6]

I saw that someone submitted on Voyeurweb also some nice pics. Absolutely worth to check out.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contris/Wha...803/index.html
(The girl pic number 4 is one of my favorites)

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contris/Wha...756/index.html

[pennywiseguy2]

Originally Posted by Klondike

the fully nude red/orange riders. there is one additional girl who might be fully nude, but I can't tell for sure from the pic. She is pictured below the thumbs - nude or topless? Bottom might be painted on, 'cause there is a hint of bush on the bike

more tonight.

Klondike

And the verdict is ........... she's only topless I'm afraid.

pennywiseguy2

[crispus]

"b"-size samples from another set (which does feature "o"s) at http://www.flickr.com/photos/crimson...7620401786669/ . Doesn't have the "pop" of the ones from the set I previously linked, by Anthony's Photography; additionally, for one so devoted to shooting from this low angle, he only rarely - for naked women riders at least - captures the ne plus ultra moment: near-leg downstroke. Picky, picky, picky...

[Klondike]

Finally, we have the fully nude multi-colored riders Included in this category are some well photographed and beautiful women, including my own personal favorite, the tri-colored blonde. My total here is 23, but I am still confused about the black and white zebra girls. I think there were four and at least one was fully nude. But I did not get good looks at the others, and one even looked like maybe a guy. So I have only included one below, but that may change.

My current up to the minute count of fully nude riders is 165, down from 170 due to some duplication.

KLondike

[crispus]

K: I note you edited your post above, realizing my post was simply a rear view of (I think) #8, of your nude group; while looking that up, I was also hoping to make up for the loss (or maybe just drive you crazy [crazier?]), and so am adding these: I know it's hard to go from indeterminate paint stage to ride, but do you have the red woman on the left of the first picture? How about the gold one, with a mask, behind what I originally thought might be a new blue (but now see you put into multi- once you saw how the painting ended up), in the second picture?

[Klondike]

Originally Posted by crispus

K: I note you edited your post above, realizing my post was simply a rear view of (I think) #8, of your nude group; while looking that up, I was also hoping to make up for the loss (or maybe just drive you crazy [crazier?]), and so am adding these: I know it's hard to go from indeterminate paint stage to ride, but do you have the red woman on the left of the first picture? How about the gold one, with a mask, behind what I originally thought might be a new blue (but now see you put into multi- once you saw how the painting ended up), in the second picture?

The yellow girl with the mask is a topless only, and goes in my yellow rider category. The red girl, on the other hand, appears to be new. Funny - I would have assumed I had her, so thanks for that one.

And yes, I edited my post after finding that the girl who's backside you posted is the same as one I feature in my own pics.

Otherwise, I am not finding many new girls at this point. Its almost a relief - "too many" of course is not possible from a girl watching point of view, but from a collector/poster point of view its, well, possible...

KLondike