WNBR this weekend Part 3

[crispus]

...and now the same guy has uploaded some fountain pictures which, while not ideal (only seen the first 5: there may be more) are better than you guys describe the ones from the other user I directed you to earlier. Sorry about that. http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxwell...ted/2008/07/14

[crispus]

...and they keep getting better until they look like this.

[flanker7]

A couple more Seattle galleries turned up on flickr. Some nice pics, but nothing really different from what we've already seen. Here are the best of the bunch.

[flanker7]

More from Seattle.

[flanker7]

Last few from this batch of Seattle pics.

[flanker7]

I'm intrigued by the fully clothed girl dressed in black. She appears in ALOT of photos, at the art gallery and the fountain. We've seen clothed riders in the other rides, but they're usually of the barely clothed variety: bikinis, underwear, skimpy shorts and the like. However, she's overdressed for any type of bike ride, wearing pin-stripe shorts and what look like expensive sandals. Even if you were going on a non-naked bike ride, wouldn't you be wearing something a little more athletic? She's also carrying a smaller clutch-type purse, which is definitely not practical for a long bike ride. There's definitely something weird going on here.

I have a couple theories. First is that she's some type of reporter. If you notice in the art gallery she seems to be talking to the riders and appears to be holding pen and paper as though she's writing. That would explain why she doesn't strip at all--she would be expected to maintain a professional decorum. That said, why would a reporter be holding pen and paper? Wouldn't she use a voice recorder?

The second possibility is that she wasn't originally part of the convoy but got convinced to join the ride along the way. While she joins in the group shot at the end, she doesn't appear in the group shot taken at the beginning of the ride. Perhaps she was biking back from someplace where she had to be decently dressed, ran into the WNBR and decided to join in the fun. Maybe she was a customer or employee at the art gallery (that might explain the pen and paper). But if that were the case, if she weren't comfortable getting naked, why wouldn't she just at least strip down to her underwear? Since she's mingling and hanging out with nothing but naked people, even playing in the fountain with them, wouldn't she feel peer-pressured into at least stripping down to her skivvies?

Anyway, it's disappointing because she's a knockout. It would have been nice to see her in some wet underwear. I included these pics just for fun (she also appears in a number of pics above), and because it's so striking to see her tastefully dressed in the midst of a nothing but naked people. I'm not personally that into the whole CNFM thing, but if you are I would think you'll enjoy them.

[stevin6]

You could read my dreams. A (semi)nude pic of that, off course, gorgeous woman would be the one million dollar pic.
I'm wondering, regarding to the fountain pics i get from Flickr, if there still not exist better wet-clothing pics of her.

[crispus]

Originally Posted by flanker7

I'm intrigued by the fully clothed girl dressed in black.

I have a couple theories. First is that she's some type of reporter. If you notice in the art gallery she seems to be talking to the riders and appears to be holding pen and paper as though she's writing. That would explain why she doesn't strip at all--she would be expected to maintain a professional decorum. That said, why would a reporter be holding pen and paper? Wouldn't she use a voice recorder?

The second possibility is that she wasn't originally part of the convoy but got convinced to join the ride along the way. While she joins in the group shot at the end, she doesn't appear in the group shot taken at the beginning of the ride. Perhaps she was biking back from someplace where she had to be decently dressed, ran into the WNBR and decided to join in the fun. Maybe she was a customer or employee at the art gallery (that might explain the pen and paper).

One of the post-ride reports says there was a reporter from Nude & Natural at the gallery (which preceded the fountain stop). Perhaps it was she, and she accompanied the ride to the fountain. As to the notebook, when I was interviewed at our local semi-sanctioned nude beach on the first hot weekday of the spring, the reporter used only pad and pen: perhaps it makes interviewees more comfortable? Did anyone see pictures of her at any point before the gallery stop?

[crispus]

Three more from Denver, which I mistakenly said was its first in my previous post about it; apparently it's the second, and the first was interrupted by arrest(s). Thus this time there was some back-and-forth with police about what would be allowed: no full nudity. Here are a couple of ways to flout that, with nonopaque panties and with a strategically-placed wrap (though in the latter case I think it helped to be a redhead!)

[flanker7]

Originally Posted by crispus

One of the post-ride reports says there was a reporter from Nude & Natural at the gallery (which preceded the fountain stop). Perhaps it was she, and she accompanied the ride to the fountain. As to the notebook, when I was interviewed at our local semi-sanctioned nude beach on the first hot weekday of the spring, the reporter used only pad and pen: perhaps it makes interviewees more comfortable? Did anyone see pictures of her at any point before the gallery stop?

After looking at the photos again I agree that reporter probably makes the most sense. The N & N angle makes it even more bizarre though, if true. I'd have to say that a reporter from Nude & Natural magazine being the only clothed person at a nude event is pretty much the definition of irony.