The 'Who Is She' Thread (no personal info allowed)

[Will100]

Surely you dont dress like that for just a few pictures, there must me more.

[tojoho49]

Fatigues look to be ARMY and belt is Marine issue;

May have been USAF before all the ink no services allows openly displaying Tats

[alibaby]

Does anyone have more?

[knobster]

Originally Posted by Will100

Surely you dont dress like that for just a few pictures, there must me more.

Here's one more... let me know if/when you find the motherlode!

[Atchonda200x]

Originally Posted by tom_cat

Mistress Jillian from Florida

Apparently you don't know how to use Google yet.

Thank you very much for that. When I searched the picture I had I seen a few pages for some website in Florida. But couldn't find a name for her

[donzer]

Originally Posted by Will100

Surely you dont dress like that for just a few pictures, there must me more.

Found these...

[jeter02]

Name? Anyone have more?

MOD NOTE: I REMOVED THIS POST EARLIER. NOW IT'S BACK. HERE IS THE REASON I REMOVED IT.

THE PERSON WHOSE PHOTOS I'VE REMOVED HAS ASKED THAT SHE NOT BE POSTED HERE. PLEASE RESPECT HER WISHES.

[Prescott]

Originally Posted by jeter02

Name? Anyone have more?

Used to have a ton of her…she was short lived on Flickr. there are lots out there is anyone recalls.

[herbull]

Originally Posted by jeter02

Name? Anyone have more?

MOD NOTE: I REMOVED THIS POST EARLIER. NOW IT'S BACK. HERE IS THE REASON I REMOVED IT.

THE PERSON WHOSE PHOTOS I'VE REMOVED HAS ASKED THAT SHE NOT BE POSTED HERE. PLEASE RESPECT HER WISHES.

I understand the need to remove posts when requested by those whom have been posted. That is fair enough. Yet in deleting the post the record of who is not to be posted is lost, and therefore there is a greater chance that the next unsuspecting person (newbie or not) could unwittingly request the same person again (and again, and again ...)

It would be handy to have a register of ladies not to be posted, yet in doing so we would effectively not be following their wishes of not being posted.

As I said, a conundrum.

[openthe4thseal]

Originally Posted by herbull

I understand the need to remove posts when requested by those whom have been posted. That is fair enough. Yet in deleting the post the record of who is not to be posted is lost, and therefore there is a greater chance that the next unsuspecting person (newbie or not) could unwittingly request the same person again (and again, and again ...)

It would be handy to have a register of ladies not to be posted, yet in doing so we would effectively not be following their wishes of not being posted.

As I said, a conundrum.

Believe me when I tell you that the scenario of which you speak happens all the time. It's just something the mods have to live with.

The idea of posting at least head-shots of the Do Not Post list has been floated before but rejected for several reasons.

First, the aforementioned conundrum.

Second, there would be few people who would use that information for less than admirable purposes.

Third, basic human nature. Few people read the rules before they post here. What makes us think they would check a list before they post? If you only knew how many PMs I have to send EVERY DAY to members telling them they violated the rules in some way, a link to those rules, and advising them to read them.

When you see a post of yours has been edited, read the mod note at the bottom. More times than not, there will be a reason given. If you pay attention to what you post, you should be able to figure out what picture was removed.

On a similar note, mods are not obligated to edit a post if part of that post violates the rules. We do not have to be that generous. It's easier and faster just to delete the whole thing. When we edit, it's our choice, and to your benefit.