VidPro Strikes Again!

[americanguy0010]

but i would be thankful if you tried

[americanguy0010]

the last one i had to make smaller to upload

[maxim230]

anyone try this one....cheers!

[ed75]

Originally Posted by americanguy0010

but i would be thankful if you tried

i think the first two pictures are of girls in this thread and theres lots of pics with no stars or hearts in the zip: https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/show...ghlight=laurel

[bigi442000]

You see how easy it can be!

[desktop123]

Found a webpage with tutorial and software that unmask pixeled photos




http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Dojo/4051/ramfaq01.htm

[bigi442000]

Well?

[teller]

on a similar note ...

[John_badau]

The last three are fakes!

They where around two years ago, there a lot of thembut they where all fake.


Look at the fisrt one, it a jean skirt, how can you look throught denim?

[vidpro]

Originally Posted by msnevil

I posted my saved "contrast". Let others see what I work with. (And as always, I welcome a civilized challenge, and constructive criticism. I have been wrong in the past, and learn from my mistake’s. Lets see if others can state the same. )

What I did:
Magic wand tool>auto-leveled>local area contrast Radius 150, local area 1> manual levels, darkened highlights 50%, underlined my probable guess 50%.

I think your software doesn't produce as good of results as mine does. If you are generating results like this from primarily auto-levels and contrast adjustment, you're going to have a hard time enhancing the luminance levels. When the results are pixelized to that degree, I recommend reducing the work area (like I did) so that you don't have to exagerate the differences between so many pixels. Iv'e included a more basic example of what my software does when using just basic functions, along with the results of your auto-levels and contrast.

I went a slightly different route:

Polygon Lasso tool (focused on a more limited area) -> Contrast +50 -> Hue -20 -> Manual levels, darkened mid-range 30% -> Brightened +25, did not underline anything, did not run any additional enhancement tools I normally do.