WNBR 2014

[tetrak74]

2 more from Mexico City.

[tetrak74]

Originally Posted by tetrak74

(1) Click on the 3 dots. If All Sizes/Download comes up, you click on the All Sizes window to view all sizes, then download the size you want.

(2) If All Sizes/Download doesn't come up, then:
(a) Right-click on the screen; you should get options which include View Page Source.
(b) Select and click on View Page Source
(c) On View Page Source, press [Ctrl]+[F] to get Find box
(d) In the Find box, type n.jpg
(e) Either the 1st or 2nd occurrence of n.jpg should be hot-linked, i.e. you could click on it to get a photo

HOWEVER, you don't want n.jpg.

(f) Next to a/o under the n.jpg hotlink should be another hotlink for the photo at the biggest size available, k.jpg, h.jpg, or b.jpg
(g) Click on that hotlink, and you'll get the photo at the bigger size, which you can then save.

I’ve found an even better way to get the biggest-sized photos from flickXr.

Using the 2 versions of the photo below as an example, using the tetrak74 1.0 method of opening View Page Source, then finding the hotlinked photo listed after the hotlinked n.jpg photo, we get:

c1.staticflickr.com/9/8487/8224590032_942c017c32_h.jpg

This is a decent size, 1290 x 725 pixels.

However, if we select a few more occurrences of n.jpg, we get to a list where all the sizes of the photo are listed. They’re listed from the smaller – s.jpg, m.jpg – to the larger – b.jpg, h.jpg, k.jpg, and sometimes o.jpg. To the left of the file names, the width and height for each file is listed.

These file names aren’t hotlinked. You’ll need to manually copy them, then edit the file name listed on View Page Source.

For this photo, the largest size listed is k.jpg. On View Page Source, it’s listed as:

c1.staticflickr.com\/9\/8487\/8224590032_dc1750c3b8_k.jpg

Note that the last block of the k.jpg name is different from the h.jpg name above.

9/8487/8224590032_942c017c32_h.jpg
9\/8487\/8224590032_dc1750c3b8_k.jpg

If you simply replace h.jpg with k.jpg:

c1.staticflickr.com/9/8487/8224590032_942c017c32_h.jpg, then
c1.staticflickr.com/9/8487/8224590032_942c017c32_k.jpg

You don’t get a bigger photo, you get a “file not found”.

Back to the k.jpg version. The \/ parts don’t look good. Simply delete each back slash “\” and keep each forward slash “/”. After this edit, you get:

c1.staticflickr.com/9/8487/8224590032_dc1750c3b8_k.jpg

For this photo, it’s not a huge difference, going from h.jpg to k.jpg. I wanted to use a safe example. You’ll get bigger contrasts elsewhere. For my preceding Mexico City posts, tetrak74 1.0 would have gotten c.jpg sized pics, around 500x700 pixels. tetrak74 2.0 got the bigger k.jpg sized pics, 2048x1520 pixels. Especially for newer photos, 2.0 will get you the much sought-after o.jpgs, 4000x3000 pixels and up.

I know that many OCCers use add-ons/apps that do this and a lot more. That’s great. The one thing about this method is that you can do it directly from flickXr itself.

[jdcpxd]

Lol...

[jc666]

Originally Posted by jdcpxd

Lol...

[charly07]

By Starbucks

[djpaoletta]

Originally Posted by tetrak74

I’ve found an even better way to get the biggest-sized photos from flickXr.

Using the 2 versions of the photo below as an example, using the tetrak74 1.0 method of opening View Page Source, then finding the hotlinked photo listed after the hotlinked n.jpg photo, we get:

c1.staticflickr.com/9/8487/8224590032_942c017c32_h.jpg

This is a decent size, 1290 x 725 pixels.

However, if we select a few more occurrences of n.jpg, we get to a list where all the sizes of the photo are listed. They’re listed from the smaller – s.jpg, m.jpg – to the larger – b.jpg, h.jpg, k.jpg, and sometimes o.jpg. To the left of the file names, the width and height for each file is listed.

These file names aren’t hotlinked. You’ll need to manually copy them, then edit the file name listed on View Page Source.

For this photo, the largest size listed is k.jpg. On View Page Source, it’s listed as:

c1.staticflickr.com\/9\/8487\/8224590032_dc1750c3b8_k.jpg

Note that the last block of the k.jpg name is different from the h.jpg name above.

9/8487/8224590032_942c017c32_h.jpg
9\/8487\/8224590032_dc1750c3b8_k.jpg

If you simply replace h.jpg with k.jpg:

c1.staticflickr.com/9/8487/8224590032_942c017c32_h.jpg, then
c1.staticflickr.com/9/8487/8224590032_942c017c32_k.jpg

You don’t get a bigger photo, you get a “file not found”.

Back to the k.jpg version. The \/ parts don’t look good. Simply delete each back slash “\” and keep each forward slash “/”. After this edit, you get:

c1.staticflickr.com/9/8487/8224590032_dc1750c3b8_k.jpg

For this photo, it’s not a huge difference, going from h.jpg to k.jpg. I wanted to use a safe example. You’ll get bigger contrasts elsewhere. For my preceding Mexico City posts, tetrak74 1.0 would have gotten c.jpg sized pics, around 500x700 pixels. tetrak74 2.0 got the bigger k.jpg sized pics, 2048x1520 pixels. Especially for newer photos, 2.0 will get you the much sought-after o.jpgs, 4000x3000 pixels and up.

I know that many OCCers use add-ons/apps that do this and a lot more. That’s great. The one thing about this method is that you can do it directly from flickXr itself.

how I could find that album?

[Fango]

youtube.com/watch?v=Qlo8G9uVATE - London

youtube.com/watch?v=5YeaYfADn58 - Guadalajara

Enjoy

Fango

[Fango]

flickr.com/photos/edgar_wang/sets/72157644818116499/detail - Watermarked Chicago gallery.

edit:

flickr.com/photos/edgar_wang/14447689044/in/set-72157644818116499

The third one over in this pic is my favorite Chicago rider from last year, back again. Awesome!

Enjoy

Fango

[Davidavin]

I see where crispus posted a few video links to the Bellingham, Wa ride this year, but I think this is a different one:


hxxp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htRiBKjbCok

Anyway - WOW! I'm extremely impressed. They might have held this on Fremont day, though. But anyway, you are looking at the best daytime WNBR on the west coast here! Seriously, looks like several hundred (200 or more) and lots of young women. I had never given this ride serious thought, but it would be great to attend. And if this is Bellinghams biggest ride yet, it just shows you that at least in some locations, the WNBR is getting better each year.

ITs not a great vid, but you get the idea - mainly, its a big ride....to top Seattle, San Francisco, and all of the other major west coast cities is no mean feat. Kudos to the organizers and its maybe like the Brighton vs London phemonemon. People maybe feel a little more relaxed knowing that the big crowds and photogs are looking elsewhere.

EDIT: the ride was Jun 6th. 120 people rode last year and it looks like 200 or more this year - definately a ride to watch!!

D (K)

[montrealmedicine2]

I had got a few good snaps on the LWNBR June/14 - Was a great day. However, I noticed over 5,000 photog's for sure..
And especially a small little dreadlocks shooter that is there every year.. to name a few? and still we never quite
seem to see all of these great snaps people are taking? Life's to short to be selfish boys - Share & Share Alike!