butt naked in public

[ckforall]

a few more for your pleasure!

***** HARDCORE PIC REMOVED *****

[wicouple08]

I love carmax

[Nijo]

This is outrageous. They blocked the handicapped parking spot for this!

[jooo]

Originally Posted by Nijo

This is outrageous. They blocked the handicapped parking spot for this!

Well, having no clothes to wear in the winter is a handicap!

[nudieman]

Originally Posted by ckforall

a few more for your pleasure!

That is an excellent post! would love to see more!!

[4andy4]

Spread em, cuff her and cavity search

[bbhubby]

a few recent finds

***** PRO PICS REMOVED *****

[bbhubby]

Fango, you've done it again. Of the three pics you removed that you said were pro pics one of the girls is on multiple other threads including this one (the red head), one I'm guessing you are interpreting as a pro pic because of the pose (the one with the scooter) and the third (in the laundry) I have absolutely no clue why you found reason to delete it. I've tried to follow your guidelines from the last time this happened but it obviously hasn't helped.

[Fango]

Originally Posted by bbhubby

Fango, you've done it again. Of the three pics you removed that you said were pro pics one of the girls is on multiple other threads including this one (the red head), one I'm guessing you are interpreting as a pro pic because of the pose (the one with the scooter) and the third (in the laundry) I have absolutely no clue why you found reason to delete it. I've tried to follow your guidelines from the last time this happened but it obviously hasn't helped.

1. The redhead is Sarah Kay. She does appear in some amateur pictures, at public nudity events, but has also done pro photoshoots for pay sites. The picture that you posted was from the latter category (most likely from the site nudeinsf).

2. The second picture was removed because it looked like a pro pic: it was lit professionally, the image was very high quality, and the subject appeared to be a model, both appearance-wise and, yes, because she was posing like a model. If it looks like a pro pic, it most likely is a pro pic. These are the criteria I use when determining whether or not to remove a picture for being pro. I don't know what else to tell you. Either take it or leave it.

3. The third picture was from Abby Winters, a pay site.

I hope you've noticed that you have not been punished (i.e. banned) for posting pro pics. Accidentally posting pics that break the rules is not cause for banning. We tend not to ban unless the rules are broken intentionally or maliciously. That said, if it bothers you this much just to have your pictures removed, then maybe you're better off not posting here.

Fango

[bbhubby]

Fango, thanks for the response. I do go out of my way to avoid posting anything that appears to be a pro pic - I'm certainly not looking for trouble. It is somewhat confusing when some pics of a model are acceptable and others aren't (referring to Sara Kay). We have no issue on the second one - I wondered myself but decided to take a chance. As for the Abby Winters one, with no watermark, nothing discernible that would indicate it is anything other than two friends goofing around and not taking the time to research the origin, other than having previously seen it on the site I'm at a loss as to how to avoid similar mistakes in the future. I know you understand that.

I'm particularly curious about the rules around NudeinSF and other professional amateur sites (particularly one out of Europe whose name escapes me at the moment). I see pics from these and others on a regular basis including several within the last 10-15 pages of this thread. Beyond too many pics and too little moderator time, is there something I'm missing as to what is acceptable?