Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalquaz
Well, Tony, I don't think you're around here anymore. But if you ever do check back, I'd like to thank you for starting my favorite thread, to introducing me to the wonderful world of naked calendars, and here are some of those DUCK pictures you wanted so badly back in the dark, early days of the thread.
There are some great pics in this calendar, and there are some average. It's kind of like a mix between the great UEA calendar and the more average Canterbury Christ Church.
The Februrary picture would have been fantastic they would have had the girls up front.
In the July picture, most of the girls have panties on..BUT, the girl that doesn't is sandwhiched between two guys. Now that's the kind of thing I like to see. That guy's stuff is no doubt touching her.
Rest of the pics in a bit.
Can I just ask too, do we know where those 2008 calendar "making of" pics came from? I've found sources for the rest of the posted pictures, but not those. Anyone have any idea? I'm curious how they "got loose".
|
Thank you for the recent stream of photos, Dalquaz. You are truly a naked calendar connoisseur.
The photo in the bar brings up something I've always wondered, why don't more girls utilize pasties? I mean, they are suppose to be naked, but you figure with all the covering a few little pasties on top/bottom and nobody would be the wiser....unless of course they showed while they were trying to cover up. Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining at all, the bare slips are awesome. I've just wondered why they wouldn't use something to cover up so the guys/girls they're shooting with don't see it all.
Slick