[jc666]

Originally Posted by nopubes

One gentleman called the police when another guy I was with, who helped me confront the voyeur, destroyed the memory card. When the police officer arrived I simply said that the individual was taking photos of underage children and it was not anyone's intent to destroy evidence. The officer could ask anyone else on the beach whether the guy was taking nude pictures of children (knowing that the mob would go against the voyeur) and the guy spit on me. He was then arrested for simple assault and we've never seen him again (not sure if he was charged with anything else. Since it was witnessed by the officer I didn't have to press charges).

So your friend destroyed that guy's property (was said photographer even breaking the law?), you then claimed he was a p********* (or for our USA members p********) and yet you're surprised when he assaults you? Words fail me...

Originally Posted by nopubes

There were several children on the beach. It was a plausible accusation that I left up to an impartial person to decide the validity of.

Yet your friend had destroyed any potential evidence.

Originally Posted by nopubes

If the individual was doing nothing illegal than they shouldn't have been trying to hide their actions.

Maybe if there weren't hypocrites like yourself throwing your weight around he wouldn't have felt the need to do try and hide what he was doing?