AI art not allowed?

[krashcdm]

Originally Posted by Fango

I honestly don't see what the point or appeal of a thread like that would be.

Right, I get that it broke the rules, and furthermore it wasn't posted in the right section (btw it seems tolerated enough in the "General Drawn ENF", so I guess anything not photorealistic is OK?). Again, just to be clear, I stated it wasn't real, in the first sentence. I wanted show the current state of that technnology, and what could eventually be possible, and hopefully exchange tips with others.

Originally Posted by dlammy

This idea could be a LOT of fun with the stories section at some point, but the technology doesn't seem to be there just yet.

The story section could be a great idea, and I'm actually working on a old-style comic generated all from prompts about a girl getting her clothes stolen and having to walk home naked. I agree the uncanny valley is strong, but when rendering art or comics it's much more believable, IMHO. But would that be taken down, too?

Originally Posted by xplondie9

I'm with Fango on this, I want to see real naked women.

Of course, I never pretended otherwise.

[~*ghetto_star*~]

Moderators, If this violates the rules, I apologize but I found some rather well done AI-created women that doesn't go into the uncanny valley or create horrible, nightmarish low-quality looking art.

Also, I'm more than sure he paid for this considering all of the free A.I. sites restrict nudity and sex or create horrible-looking art

Here, the user was able to take his ideas and blend them together to create something that is fun to look at and not creepy.

Also, you can see how he was able to use specific attributes about hair color, nudity level, and ethnicity to create exactly what he was looking for. For example, there is a picture of an Asian woman, with blonde hair, nude with boots, and pregnant. Also, there is a middle-aged woman, with grey hair and glasses who is also pregnant.

Older women are shown with accurate aging effects on their breasts and bodies. There is a reasonably accurate depiction of a woman of color and a very detailed depicture of a MILF in a blue dress with a mid-thigh slit and a naked bride in her veil posing near a rock boudoir style.

(ETA) it should be noted that the creator of these pics did state that 99% of the pics are "misses" only around 1% are good ones.

[brunettesrule]

I am against allowing this stuff here because there is already an existing problem with people continuing to repost fake/photoshopped pics. However, there could be an exception for this if the poster watermarks it in an obvious spot with "Fake - AI generated" when they post it. It would prevent the shots from inadvertently or deliberately being used on threads to devoted to real nude photos.

[~*ghetto_star*~]

Originally Posted by brunettesrule

I am against allowing this stuff here because there is already an existing problem with people continuing to repost fake/photoshopped pics. However, there could be an exception for this if the poster watermarks it in an obvious spot with "Fake - AI-generated" when they post it. It would prevent the shots from inadvertently or deliberately being used on threads to devoted to real nude photos.

I have noticed the fake and photoshopped pics, especially pics of amateurs' heads being placed on pornstars' bodies and another very poorly done fakes and I do understand it takes away from a forum that is built on real amateur content.

I think just that maybe one thread for this stuff because we are seeing the AI-created stories threads and maybe this can function as illustrations but then again, I didn't join OCC for cartoons/digital art, I joined this forum because I like looking at everyday, relatable women.

This might be better served elsewhere.

[~*ghetto_star*~]

So after spending about 5 hours trying to install this, I just gave up because I see my computer isn't quite strong enough, while I do have a gaming PC, it's a little on the old side and will not be able to this.

I was hoping to be able to create a MILF or put a woman (ex. Jeanne) in an AI secenario.

[ds97]

I haven't installed anything, just working from my browser using free sources, and am starting to get some real good artwork reproduction (such as full frontal nude Waterhouse paintings). I definitely see a forum idea here, sharing the best results and voting on which ones to work further on by modifying prompts etc.
This is the reason I logged into OCC again today, after a long break, just to find 1) the general drawn enf thread 2) this thread.
IMO, the watermark idea is not bad, as an allowed exception.

[~*ghetto_star*~]

When talking to dirtyharry11, he mention that the first nude picture we took of Jeanne was in October 1971. Almost immediately, I began scribbling a fictional, alternate history story in which Harry submits that first nude of Jeanne to Playboy Magazine, and 7 months later she is named Miss May 1972 (the actual Miss May '72 was Deanna Baker).

Because Harry took so many nude pictures of Jeanne in the 1970s, the A.I. would be able to accurately recreate her face, hairstyle, breast shape, figure, buttocks, pubic grooming, and legs from that time period. When I showed Harry an A.I. upscaled image of Jeanne and he say that it looked exactly how she looked at the time. So it's safe to say that even the most basic A.I. can be very accurate.

Also, I've seen A.I. be able to accurately emulate the photography styles of different eras and even of photographers themselves. So it wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility that A.I. could emulate the styles of Pompeo Posar, Bill Figge, Dwight Hooker, or Mario Casilli, photographers who were employed at Playboy in the early 70s.

Had I been able to do this, along with creating a fictional May 1972 edition of Playboy, I'm sure Harry would have found it entertaining and enjoyed it but also I think an ethical issue sort of comes into play because while my idea would have been a fun and flattering look at Jeanne had she taken a different path in life back in 1971, A.I. can also extremely dangerous, which is why many of the sites outright ban NSFW or place it behind a paywall and honestly I do worry about A.I. being used to destroy somebody's reputation.

If that was a rambling rant, I apologize.

[ds97]

Originally Posted by ~*ghetto_star*~

When talking to dirtyharry11, he mention that the first nude picture we took of Jeanne was in October 1971. Almost immediately, I began scribbling a fictional, alternate history story in which Harry submits that first nude of Jeanne to Playboy Magazine, and 7 months later she is named Miss May 1972 (the actual Miss May '72 was Deanna Baker).

Because Harry took so many nude pictures of Jeanne in the 1970s, the A.I. would be able to accurately recreate her face, hairstyle, breast shape, figure, buttocks, pubic grooming, and legs from that time period. When I showed Harry an A.I. upscaled image of Jeanne and he say that it looked exactly how she looked at the time. So it's safe to say that even the most basic A.I. can be very accurate.

Also, I've seen A.I. be able to accurately emulate the photography styles of different eras and even of photographers themselves. So it wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility that A.I. could emulate the styles of Pompeo Posar, Bill Figge, Dwight Hooker, or Mario Casilli, photographers who were employed at Playboy in the early 70s.

Had I been able to do this, along with creating a fictional May 1972 edition of Playboy, I'm sure Harry would have found it entertaining and enjoyed it but also I think an ethical issue sort of comes into play because while my idea would have been a fun and flattering look at Jeanne had she taken a different path in life back in 1971, A.I. can also extremely dangerous, which is why many of the sites outright ban NSFW or place it behind a paywall and honestly I do worry about A.I. being used to destroy somebody's reputation.

If that was a rambling rant, I apologize.

Sorry, but who is Harry? And did you or did you not manage with these AI pics and show them to Harry?
For what I've seen, creating images with faces of real persons is not that easy yet, which is probably a good thing. It doesn't recognise the names of many well-known celebrities, so I don't understand how it will know how to recreate "Jeanne".
That said, I would love to obtain A.I. pictures that look like what my wife looked like nude two-three decades ago, based on clothed pictures from that era and nude pictures from now + knowledge about what she looked like by that time. Even though I probably don't know everything yet, I really don't think the A.I. is accurately there yet.

[ds97]

Originally Posted by xplondie9

I'm with Fango on this, I want to see real naked women.

So you're not the least turned on by this image then?
(And in case anyone thinks it looks underage: I did request for the subject to be 18 years old)

Actually, I was asking for a work by painter Vladimir Belsky, but apparently the painter was not known to the A.I. and then I got this nice (if you ask me) one...

[~*ghetto_star*~]

Originally Posted by ds97

Sorry, but who is Harry? And did you or did you not manage with these AI pics and show them to Harry?
For what I've seen, creating images with faces of real persons is not that easy yet, which is probably a good thing. It doesn't recognise the names of many well-known celebrities, so I don't understand how it will know how to recreate "Jeanne".
That said, I would love to obtain A.I. pictures that look like what my wife looked like nude two-three decades ago, based on clothed pictures from that era and nude pictures from now + knowledge about what she looked like by that time. Even though I probably don't know everything yet, I really don't think the A.I. is accurately there yet.

Harry is a member of OCC he uses the username "dirtyharry11" and he routinely posts pics of his wife Jeanne, he also has albums of her. He has literally over 50 years' worth of nudes of her going back to October 1971.

It can recreate Jeanne because most of these A.I. art programs allow you to upload images to give the A.I. a starting point, also given the fact that A.I. gets information from the internet, it's quite easy for the internet to learn the photography styles of different photographers.

Is its accurately there yet? Not really but it won't be long because the A.I. is constantly improving and some people are already creating photorealistic images