Tights, Pantyhose and Leggings.

[burn333]

--350--

[burn333]

--351--

[phguy48]

I have got to go see this pantyhose fashion show! Damn!

[hal9000i]

It's funny how the wheel turns in the fashion world, isn't it? just a few years ago the fashionistas were all militantly declaring that pantyhose were dead-- they made you look like an old woman and your legs look orange-- that was the standard refrain.

Well, looking at these images we know that's not true. Also note the panties-- a few years ago it was a thong or nothing. Any panty providing any coverage in the back was considered "granny panties" and a huge fashion faux paus.

Hal

[burn333]

--352--

[burn333]

--353--

[burn333]

--354--

[geezer5552]

Originally Posted by hal9000i

It's funny how the wheel turns in the fashion world, isn't it? just a few years ago the fashionistas were all militantly declaring that pantyhose were dead-- they made you look like an old woman and your legs look orange-- that was the standard refrain.

Well, looking at these images we know that's not true. Also note the panties-- a few years ago it was a thong or nothing. Any panty providing any coverage in the back was considered "granny panties" and a huge fashion faux paus.

Hal

Like your thinking, but if you look at the panty area, each of the models is indeed wearing a thong under the pantyhose. The panty you are talking about is woven into the pantyhose itself. Now I like the idea of something besides a thong -- boyshorts, briefs, bikinis that cover more of the backside than the thong string, but you won't find it on these models. I think it's some kind of modesty panty all models wear for something like this.

Also haven't seen a lot out in the public where pantyhose, or stockings of any kind are making a big comeback. Could be I'm just hanging/looking at the wrong crowd.

And where was this show taken, and is there a video?

G

[burn333]

--355--

[burn333]

--356--