Spread in Heels

[jim914109]

Had some of these to post...

***** PRO PICS REMOVED *****

[jim914109]

Continued...

[Ziggie00]

enjoy!

[catflap]

nice thread heres some more

[Fango]

Originally Posted by jim914109

Haha - all of these pics came from other OCC thread posts. That is usually my measure of what's okay to post. Also a big disincentive to post material from other sources, which is part of the reason why OCC is 90% plus reposts. Most of my original finds with high thanks are reposted within days by the high qty posters/reposters.

If you could please let me know where you found it so it can be removed from there too, that would be appreciated.

Thanks

Fango

[jim914109]

Originally Posted by Fango

If you could please let me know where you found it so it can be removed from there too, that would be appreciated.

Thanks

Fango

Sorry, Fango - I save the pics I download from OCC in an OCC folder with subfolders by theme, not by the thread I got them from, so I wouldn't be able to tell you where in OCC they came from.

I can usually tell a pro pic from an amateur pic pretty easily, and none of the ones I posted appeared pro to me. In the meantime, pro pics are all over OCC. Yes, I do report the most obvious and egregious ones, art nudes that have been filched from sites like DA, because I have too much respect for those photographers. I usually include a reference to who the photographer or model is when I report them. The ones that come from pay porn sites I let go by - there are so many, and who cares? If I were to report every pro pic I encountered here it would become a full-time job, and I would be doing the mods job.

In the meantime, I have some original stuff that I will not post here, because everything of value that I've found elsewhere and posted here has been reposted numerous times by the "volume posters."

I try mightily to follow the rules here. I go out of my way to do things like change file names when they include identifying info, and avoid even the tiniest of watermarks. I know the mods' job is a difficult one, and I'm not trying to make it more difficult - just trying to make a point.

[Fango]

Originally Posted by jim914109

I can usually tell a pro pic from an amateur pic pretty easily, and none of the ones I posted appeared pro to me. In the meantime, pro pics are all over OCC. Yes, I do report the most obvious and egregious ones, art nudes that have been filched from sites like DA, because I have too much respect for those photographers. I usually include a reference to who the photographer or model is when I report them. The ones that come from pay porn sites I let go by - there are so many, and who cares? If I were to report every pro pic I encountered here it would become a full-time job, and I would be doing the mods job.

I hate to tell you this, but you're doing it the wrong way around. "Art pics" from DA or MM or Flickr, etc., are the ones that are allowed. "Pro pics" from pay sites and adult magazines are the ones that should be reported and need to be removed. They are the ones we do care about. On occasion, art pics will get removed as pro pics if they look similar enough and there's no context for them, but on the whole, they are fine to stay. The only exception is if they're watermarked with a URL or copyright symbol.

Originally Posted by jim914109

In the meantime, I have some original stuff that I will not post here, because everything of value that I've found elsewhere and posted here has been reposted numerous times by the "volume posters."

If you're worried about this, you can always put a watermark on the (original) pics.

Fango

[Ty Barker]

but they were cropped out. Thought you might like it anyway.

[ondgo321]

a few of a great view. had a lot more that I could put up but you'd have to take my word about the heels!

[bbwbangtheory]