![]() |
Our forum has over 12 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!
|
#381
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They are back with a new group. Whatever happened, they're not saying.
twitter.com ClubTopless/status/1368325624482430977 Quote:
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fritzfreitag For This Useful Post: | ||
#382
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm not social-media-savvy (this place being pretty much the extent of my abilities). But according to posts made the last couple days, when asked "Twitter yanked it down? Please say no" the response was:
Quote:
Quote:
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to y2kv2 For This Useful Post: | ||
#383
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They have a disclaimer stating the group is not for cis-men, though that may have just carried over from the old Twitter page.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AtlanticWave For This Useful Post: | ||
#384
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There was a comment to that effect in the twitter comments linked above. Starting to make me wonder if the reason everything went "tits-up" with them is because of a problem with one of the hetero males that is associated with them somehow. Why else would "no cis men" all of a sudden be a talking point? Betting it's either the boyfriend/husband of one of the members got real possessive & wrapped around the axle over his woman being "degenerate" by associating with the rest of them & baring her all for all to see, or he was perving other girls in the group & it caused problems.
Granted this is all speculation. But the old site was very open about their willingness to include "cis men" provided they maintained a respectful decorum; an entirely logical, reasonable position to take. And now, based on the few statements that have been offered thus far, it appears that open-mindedness towards the male half of the species has evaporated. I'm suddenly taken back to the scene in the movie Higher Learning where Kristy Swanson is handing out flyers for an "anti-sexual discrimination" seminar, and the white guy who she's been flirty with asks for one bc he's genuinely interested in it. She hesitates and says "it's only for women" and he replies with "wait, you're saying gender discrimination is bad, that's why you're promoting this lecture, and now you're discriminating against me saying I can't go because of my gender?" Go figure... |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to y2kv2 For This Useful Post: | ||
#385
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Disappointed to learn the OCTPFAS blog is gone, and with it all those years of images!
Whatever this new Twitter account may add up to, the hostility to "cis-men" does not bode well. ![]() |
#386
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
y2k... I'm guessing something similar. The blog was run by a cis male associate who sometimes appeared in their pictures. About two years ago the group engaged in some group sexual experimentation and I'm guessing it eventually ended badly if the rebirth is now wholly just women.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to graeno For This Useful Post: | ||
#387
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now that it's all over... I gotta ask, did anyone ever find out who this girl is? All time fave.
|
The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to Laurencebird9492 For This Useful Post: | ||
AtlanticWave, butterfly_pink_73, congokurtz, Dave998, exloverboy, Fatbah55, fireballxl5, Flam1ng0, gbblee, GP1234, Iamsailing, Jaman8754, jimlinn, joelook, kaiserlee, krullbagge, Lakist, mm1921, patrick85, placebo_addict, retrac55, Tkmarshall, tom1211, waliant, WalnutSolo, xp2, xxxxenophile, zoomie9 |
#388
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
What you're suggesting kinda makes sense but only in the context of one of the females who participated in that "group grope" did so without the express permission of her man. Alternately, as I mentioned earlier, he wanted a role (as iirc that experience was solely female, as in there were no males present) larger than what he had and his not getting it sufficiently caused irreparable tension. Or it was as simple as he banged someone else in the group/one of the girls in the group seduced the man of another girl against her will. Either of those would do it too. I remember seeing at least one guy in their rooftop pics but tbth I never cared enough to look into how they maintained their online presence; as long as good pics/video was provided, that's all I was interested in. Nothing against anyone who DID do that, mind you...If you're talking about the one in front, I agree. Missed her over the course of the last few years, and thank you for posting that pic. I hadn't seen it before. |
The Following User Says Thank You to y2kv2 For This Useful Post: | ||
#389
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's some more old pictures of her, if any of y'all need a reminder of how attractive this woman is. I'll bet she's done some modelling at some point.
|
The Following 41 Users Say Thank You to Laurencebird9492 For This Useful Post: | ||
AtlanticWave, atlast123, butterfly_pink_73, chupakabras, dark12, Dave998, dbsgmass, exloverboy, fireballxl5, Flam1ng0, GP1234, Iamsailing, jerseyjerzzz, kaiserlee, KarlMalone, karp, krullbagge, Lakist, libertyone, mdiris, mewsha, mike5903, MilesMeadhan, mm1921, Nocturnal Terror, North680, patrick85, ppdevaaris, retrac55, sammy111, spectre14, squares, tevver69, Tkmarshall, tobi78, tom1211, waliant, Wunderlichman, xxxxenophile, yanick, zoomie9 |
#390
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The first sexual event was group masturbation over 2 years ago. Then they had a sauna / erotica roleplay post. Then they had the group sex experimentation. |
The Following User Says Thank You to graeno For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
naked in public, public nudity, topless |
Free Videos - Updated Daily
|
|
|