High Def finds

[pingman62301]

My last two posts disappeared, so this will be my last post on this forum, I will stick to sc posts only

[openthe4thseal]

Originally Posted by pingman62301

My last two posts disappeared, so this will be my last post on this forum, I will stick to sc posts only

One post that was removed was nothing but reposts of videos posted a month or two ago.

Your last post that was removed was from Abby Winters and had it's watermark redited out.

[suihu369]

Originally Posted by openthe4thseal

One post that was removed was nothing but reposts of videos posted a month or two ago.

Your last post that was removed was from Abby Winters and had it's watermark redited out.

Certainly valid reasons for removing vids and I think we all inherently respect and appreciate the role moderators play. Question, though: how hard would it have been to send a PM to the poster explaining the what-and-why of your actions?

FWIW I've moderated and been an admin on forum sites going back to the late 90's. Alienating your most valued members is not the best path for anyone. As a financial contributor to the site I don't like that we've lost so many great content providers.

[openthe4thseal]

Originally Posted by suihu369

Certainly valid reasons for removing vids and I think we all inherently respect and appreciate the role moderators play. Question, though: how hard would it have been to send a PM to the poster explaining the what-and-why of your actions?

FWIW I've moderated and been an admin on forum sites going back to the late 90's. Alienating your most valued members is not the best path for anyone. As a financial contributor to the site I don't like that we've lost so many great content providers.

It wouldn't have been hard at all, unless you multiply that by the number of edits and removals I have to do here each day. Then I would be here all day. It's just not practical from a time standpoint.

[everlong057]

Originally Posted by suihu369

Certainly valid reasons for removing vids and I think we all inherently respect and appreciate the role moderators play. Question, though: how hard would it have been to send a PM to the poster explaining the what-and-why of your actions?

FWIW I've moderated and been an admin on forum sites going back to the late 90's. Alienating your most valued members is not the best path for anyone. As a financial contributor to the site I don't like that we've lost so many great content providers.

I'm glad to have run into these posts, as I gotta go with, suihu. I was lucky enough to have found OCC early & made enough contributions to get a 'lifetime membership'. I don't think I ever knew about the lifetime thing until I was told I was given one.

Sadly, it seems to me anyway, OCC has veered towards the route of those who would regulate and censor, based on what they deem worthy of such. I am in no way talking about allowing watermarked or child images here, and I've always loved that OCC has NEVER accepted the use degrading words towards women.

Suffice to say, it seems it's gone well past 'decency' rules these days.

Fuck Political Correctness!

everlong

[everlong057]

Originally Posted by openthe4thseal

It wouldn't have been hard at all, unless you multiply that by the number of edits and removals I have to do here each day. Then I would be here all day. It's just not practical from a time standpoint.

As to this smoke blowing reply. What would be so difficult about creating several standard templates, for the several main reasons for dropping a post, for a reason you did not like?

Even more so, why wouldn't you take 2 minutes to show personal respect to OCC members, as has been made a point of here?

You're the reason I haven't posted in .... however long it is.

[openthe4thseal]

Originally Posted by everlong057

I'm glad to have run into these posts, as I gotta go with, suihu. I was lucky enough to have found OCC early & made enough contributions to get a 'lifetime membership'. I don't think I ever knew about the lifetime thing until I was told I was given one.

Sadly, it seems to me anyway, OCC has veered towards the route of those who would regulate and censor, based on what they deem worthy of such. I am in no way talking about allowing watermarked or child images here, and I've always loved that OCC has NEVER accepted the use degrading words towards women.

Suffice to say, it seems it's gone well past 'decency' rules these days.

Fuck Political Correctness!

everlong

Originally Posted by everlong057

As to this smoke blowing reply. What would be so difficult about creating several standard templates, for the several main reasons for dropping a post, for a reason you did not like?

Even more so, why wouldn't you take 2 minutes to show personal respect to OCC members, as has been made a point of here?

You're the reason I haven't posted in .... however long it is.

This is a video thread and as such, "discussions" are discouraged, so I will end this "discussion."

You are entitled to your opinion but you are wrong. We do not "regulate and censor, based on what (we) deem worthy." If this was the case, there are plenty of photos 300+ pound cows posted on this site that would have been removed.

There are way too many reasons for why a post is edited or removed, so just when you think you have enough "templates," you have to make another one.

I have found the lack of respect swings both ways. There are a lot of people who just cannot accept the decisions of the mods and have to whine about it instead of taking personal responsibility.

It's painfully obvious with your use of profanity and your comments directed toward me that you're problem is with me. That is your choice, not mine.

This "discussion" has ended

[pingman62301]

Silly girls

[suihu369]

Pingman62301, thank you!

[pingman62301]

Girl has huge nipples