|
Our forum has over 13 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!
|
|
|
Our forum has over 13 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!
|
|
#21
09-24-2007, 09:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
great idea...love to see the thread continuing. Nice pic too. Here's is my rating: 6/10, and here is how I came to it:-
Good points 1. HQ pic, where you can see full body, including most of face 2. Hot subject 3. Nice matching clothes 4. Striking choice of underwear colour (albeit not matching, but what hell!) 5. Great legs 6. Certain voyeur feel Bad points 1. Legs are far too shut--can see barely any of her thigh etc. 2. No hint at all of butt cheeks 3. No pussy definition through crotch of underwear 4. Nothing special about the picture 
|
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to frankcpapp For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#22
09-25-2007, 12:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I rate your pic frankcpapp 4.5/10
Good: Nice shot of ass Nice legs Nice short skirt Bad: Bad lighting Fuzzy not a good shot of thong (due to lighting) No frontal view Ok heres mine
|
|
#23
09-27-2007, 08:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great pic! I rate it 7 out of 10.
Good 1. Full body pic 2. Hot subject! 3. Great legs and thighs! 4. Decent lighting/HQ etc. 5. Sexy outfit 6. Nice, matching knickers 7. Little wet spot on crotch of knickers...mmm Bad 1. No arse view 2. No pussy definition 3. Distraction of guy in back, and fact that she is looking away (would have loved to see a face shot)
|
|
#24
09-27-2007, 12:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
hmm Id rate that pic 5/10
Good: Nice view of panty Nice legs Nicely spread Bad: Obviously posed (this loses points) Ugly panties No face in pic Fat stomach also ruins pic Heres the next pic
|
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Unknown20 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#25
09-28-2007, 06:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another great pic. I give this one, again, 7 out of 10.
Good 1. Great arse 2. Great legs 3. Sexy panties 4. Lovely skirt that matches panties 5. Nice pussy definition, i.e., no restriction from knickers 6. Good lighting 7. Def candid Bad 1. Could have been bigger, more HQ 2. No face pic 3. No body pic *****WATERMARKED PHOTO REMOVED***** Last edited by Alex; 10-02-2007 at 03:29 PM.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to frankcpapp For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#26
09-28-2007, 06:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Id rate it 4.5/10
Good: Nice candid shot Good view of legs can see thong Good lighting Bad: No shot of ass Not much thong shown No face in shot a guys ass in shot Next pic
|
|
#27
09-29-2007, 12:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
however strange this may sound (it may be personal preference too), I find nothing wrong with this pic
-Nice panties (the lighting emphasized their shimmer) -Plenty exposed -Completely candid -Excellent timing -Close enough -To boot, the girl is hot too and since I probably should find something wrong... -I don't like her sunglasses. Or her teeth. But neither of those are the point are they? 10/10 next...a little something different. Please note that this is an upshort, so naturally less is on display. Last edited by Alex; 10-02-2007 at 03:30 PM.
|
|
#28
09-29-2007, 02:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry ragincajun we are rating upskirts so upshorts dont really count :/
Id rate it 2/10 Good: Some panty exposed Slight frontal Bad: Not upskirt Barely a shot Couldnt really rate it. anyway heres mine
|
|
#29
09-30-2007, 03:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
7/10
-lots on view -decent lighting -no face shot -plain panties -ambiguous as to pose or candid to make up for my upshort...goin stargazin' this is one of my favs
|
|
#30
09-30-2007, 05:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good pic. Id rate it 7/10
Good: Nice panty shot Good frontal Legs widely spread Interesting panties nice legs Bad: Possessed face spoils pic I suppose she does look kinda young Red eyes It may be posed due to expression. Heres mine.
|
 |
|
|
