Pedro's Original Nudist Beach Shots 2010 - Page 20

Pedro the Fisherman · #**191** 07-25-2010, 05:26 AM

Quote:

I've never owned one of these cell phone cameras, but I'm looking into it. Suppose you are on a beach that has vendors or anything for sale. At Wreck Beach, I often walk around with my wallet in my hand on my way to get food or something. So could you cut a few holes in a wallet, stick the cell phone in there, and walk around snapping pics blind (but at close range) undetected? At Wreck, everyone is at close range so you'd be bound to get lots of good shots - just point anywhere and you'd at least get a boob or two in your pic. Just pull the ol' "I'm looking for a vendor" routine.

"Lets see......(click).......are there any vendors over there?......(click)........nope..........mmmmm.... .....(click, click).......maybe over this way?.........(click)........man, I'm getting hungry......"

I have tried the 'cut a hole for the lens' thing when I started, it's terrible! You get back to the car and find you have loads of blurry photos of nothing in particular! You need to see what you are taking, at least the area, if not the subjects. I try and set the camera up on an area and hope someone uses that part of the beach. You can then push the shutter button whilst reading or even looking away from the subjects. The best time is when they return from a swim, as lying down, they are harder to shoot and less flesh is on display. I envy the guys where everyone walks along the shoreline, you could set up and click away all day! Here, the sloping beach and static (apart from swimmimg) nature of the beach users makes it harder.

Anyway, I have waffled (and grumbled

) enough for now, so it is time for some photos! I hope these are good enough quality for the 'fussy' members, they were taken using my newer 10mp camera with a 5x optical lens.

As I have said before, it is not possible to get any closer, without risking being caught. These girls were a little suspicious already, as they (not suprisingly

) were attracting a fair amount of attention from single men. The guy who will creep into shot later at the bottom right nearly cost the whole shoot. I decided to press on, but he was only a few feet in front of the camera though. It would have been very easy for him to tell the girls what I was up to, had he seen the camera. That is what this sort of stuff is all about, not making sure my photos are pro quality!

Klondike · #**192** 07-25-2010, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

[SIZE="4"]I have tried the 'cut a hole for the lens' thing when I started, it's terrible! You get back to the car and find you have loads of blurry photos of nothing in particular! You need to see what you are taking, at least the area, if not the subjects. I try and set the camera up on an area and hope someone uses that part of the beach. You can then push the shutter button whilst reading or even looking away from the subjects. The best time is when they return from a swim, as lying down, they are harder to shoot and less flesh is on display. I envy the guys where everyone walks along the shoreline, you could set up and click away all day! Here, the sloping beach and static (apart from swimmimg) nature of the beach users makes it harder.

I know what you mean, but Wreck Beach is kind of unusual because it IS so crowded. You almost literally could not avoid getting boobs in your shots, even if you tried! One of the main problems with hidden shots from prone or seated positions is getting the camera up high enough to avoid ground level obstructions. I have shot blind while standing at OCF in the past and come away with some great pics. OCF is like Wreck - very crowded so you are always in very close. Thats the difference. At your beach perhaps and most other beaches, this would not work well. You need to be in very crowded situations for it to be profitable. THere, a babe at 4ft distance will likely get in your shot. Just slow down or stop, hold your hand still at your waste, click and it shouldn't be too blurry in sunlight conditions.

Klondike

igottago8 · #**193** 07-25-2010, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

I have tried the 'cut a hole for the lens' thing when I started, it's terrible! You get back to the car and find you have loads of blurry photos of nothing in particular! You need to see what you are taking, at least the area, if not the subjects. I try and set the camera up on an area and hope someone uses that part of the beach. You can then push the shutter button whilst reading or even looking away from the subjects. The best time is when they return from a swim, as lying down, they are harder to shoot and less flesh is on display. I envy the guys where everyone walks along the shoreline, you could set up and click away all day! Here, the sloping beach and static (apart from swimmimg) nature of the beach users makes it harder.

Anyway, I have waffled (and grumbled

) enough for now, so it is time for some photos! I hope these are good enough quality for the 'fussy' members, they were taken using my newer 10mp camera with a 5x optical lens.

As I have said before, it is not possible to get any closer, without risking being caught. These girls were a little suspicious already, as they (not suprisingly

) were attracting a fair amount of attention from single men. The guy who will creep into shot later at the bottom right nearly cost the whole shoot. I decided to press on, but he was only a few feet in front of the camera though. It would have been very easy for him to tell the girls what I was up to, had he seen the camera. That is what this sort of stuff is all about, not making sure my photos are pro quality!

Pedro, your contributions to OCC are terrific, please don't let the comments of a few discourage you. Those that have taken pics at the beach and elsewhere before, understand how difficult it can be to not be detected by the subjects - please keep up the great pics, many folks on OCC greatly appreciate and respect your efforts..cheers

Bronne · #**194** 07-25-2010, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

When a post starts with 'I dont mean to complain'.....that is exactly what they want to do! I get no money for doing this, I do have a better camera now, but I will not be using it in an area that has sand (like the shot above) as it will be trashed. I also take into account that at any minute (it has happened!) that some angry person has caught me taking photos and decides to stop me by smahing the camera. Would you risk an expensive camera yourself? I suggest you take your mobile phone camera and try and match the shot above!

If I was charging you money for these shots, then maybe I could afford better gear, as it is, I am living off what is left of my pension (which I had to take early, due to medical problems) and what little interest I get from my savings.

If you want better shots, buy me the camera you think I should use and I'll give it a try....if not, BUTT OUT
First complaints about my file names now this!
I am going to lie down in a darkened room now, we artistic types are known to take away our ball, if we get criticised too much and not post any more. I post what I can, take it or leave it.

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

.

I'll (probably) post more shots of the group with two cuties in, WHEN I feel like it.

OHHH MY GOD can you type with big angry letters I just wondered why the res was so low man....

And yes : I do have pics of my own, taken with cellphones.. that way you can get in close and take shots without raising suspicion...

heres some examples: Swedish beach.

I would post here more but as they are all taken by me on the same Swedish beach and as these pics spread and are also very frequent on the Swedish boards it soon gets uncomfortable... I have blurred the face on one girl, i dont want her to get recognized...

Bronne · #**195** 07-25-2010, 05:27 PM

BTW.. this woman with the red hat https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...6&d=1280092719

when wearing some clothing that is red on a Swedish nudist beach is a sign for "wanting to play" u can often see some couples using this "colorcode" and great things can happen.. and as i was quite close to this specific lady we struck up conversation and things later got quite hot and sexy right then and there... the only problem is that there is ALWAYS an audience in the shape of ugly old guys wanting to look and stroke their tiny dicks and that can really be a turnoff... but you gotta take the good with the bad, sometimes an angry stare is enough to get them away...

Bronne · #**196** 07-25-2010, 05:31 PM

another anequedote... this girl https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...7&d=1280092719

is the same as in pic no 2 and 3 only this was taken in 2007 and 2 and 3 was taken this year.... if you watch VERY closely you can see that her body has aged a bit, keep in mind that she is WELL over 40 so she still looks REALLY REALLY good

she is one of those girls who very clearly LIKES to show her body, and if you get close to her and she sees that you like it she just spreads her legs even more. She watched me get off for her a couple of times and she likes it....

Bronne · #**197** 07-25-2010, 05:53 PM

I would also like to add that i think its great that guys like Pedro post real voypics from beaches, its not easy. But Pedros pics are just not my style at all, to only get photos from afar is really boring, i also realize that this is somewhat a geoproblem. For example : on "my" beach which is a rocky Swedish westcoast beach the area of the nude beach is very limited, so if there are hot girls around all of them are within close range

and because the entire beach is made of rocks the "natural" spots to lay down are also limited, and this means that it is very easy to get close to the hot girls and it seems completely natural for you to lay down right next to them. When you have endless sandy beaches this is a very big problem to get really close...

Also i prefer to use my cellphone for two reasons: because i am very close the quality of the cam is sufficient and like my resent pics that are made with SonyEricsson X10 mini ( which is not the best cellcam byfar) still produces good results and especially with this phone it is VERY easy to just pretend that you are making a phonecall and snap away

the focus on the SE phones are also very fast btw.

I have also tried the LG crystal with 8 mp but as it was a foldout and the optics and autofocus was very slow it was completely worthless.

I have tried the Nokia N95 which hade the best optics by far but it was all ruined as the autofocus was too slow and in these situations you need something that cliks away FAST...

Many years ago when SE launched the first 3.2 mp i took this photo, its the same beach, this is a couple that is regular and always puts on shows and i mean acutal SHOWS people... the white stuff is suncream used as anal lubricant and she was drilled quite good

I blurred face on this one...

Pedro the Fisherman · #**198** 07-25-2010, 05:58 PM

Nice shots, I'll let you take over now!

Bronne · #**199** 07-25-2010, 05:59 PM

As i am feeling generous and beacuse there was complaints that i didint post anything of my own, here is a couple from my ex taken on the same beach, face is blurred for obvious reasons

I should also meantion that its the same beach but its NOT at the nudist area, we used to get naked all around the place just for the fun of it. And noone ever said anything, ( luckily sweden is very liberal with nudity) and its actually allowed to get nude everywhere as long as there is no sexual behaviour, but almotst nobody does it....

her body was great but i just couldnt live with her even though we have kids together.. sometimes life just doesnt work out the way you want

Bronne · #**200** 07-25-2010, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

Nice shots, I'll let you take over now!

Haha thanks but this is your thread myfriend, U run the show here

just wanted to show my philosphy on the art of taking voypics from the beach... because it really is an artform that very few have the op or guts to master....

take this chick for example https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...4&d=1280092719

i have had her a thousand times within a meter in front of me doing a full spread eagle showing a totally shaved pussy AND a clitpiercing, i have been DYING to get that specific shot but i just havent dared to yet.............. But: as she is a regular i am shure to get it before this summer is over

The Following 91 Users Say Thank You to Pedro the Fisherman For This Useful Post:
akivion, amed1913, amfibia, archiehillie, ausguy, BaconBot, barsuk, Blackadder, Bohr, bushmn05, cant_think_of_one, CaptainJackson, captkerp, chandran1, crispus, cst.85, cthulhu, darksky_2003, dieselboy, dirtydokken, dixler, dreamwish, droop2005, ERREALA, ExposeMe, F-15c, Fango, feelyatdacat, fkk2211, flanker7, framis, galahad39, garm, goalie411, go_vics, Grip4415, Groan, gudnasen, GundeSvan, herr_Roald, hilocrc, hockeypuck, igottago8, irish drunkard, I_Love_Naked_Girls, JanKlod, jc666, jhonny_v, joermont, junkieny, karp, Klondike, krashcdm, lejude, Mahoney, marketman16, michibeck, neil733, nervous, odites999, one1one, oregonlt3, peepeerl, Perr, phatboi21, portatile, qagyhidu, quietones, rickmadden, r_o_o_r, sandcrab, shaveshave, sil3, smovbuf2, Sr. Raro, sserena, stevin6, stylo, sweendoggy, swimliketarzan, testme97, tetrak74, trotsi69, Twilo_, vayaputada, Vgoto, vittux, wduffo, weedhopper2386, wertox, zodavand

The Following User Says Thank You to Klondike For This Useful Post:
jhonny_v

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to igottago8 For This Useful Post:
go_vics, jhonny_v, soulac

The Following 35 Users Say Thank You to Bronne For This Useful Post:
akivion, amfibia, banya2, bushmn05, captkerp, casserres, chandran1, endoftheline, garm, gefu2012, gnyet, goalie411, Groan, gudnasen, GundeSvan, JanKlod, jhonny_v, John Thomas, junkieny, kinca, Krist, leckerlion, loxxie, mondokane, nervous, pazy, phatboi21, portatile, rickmadden, Sr. Raro, stevin6, testme97, vittux, xsc3000, zodavand

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bronne For This Useful Post:
jhonny_v, lievas, stevin6, testme97

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bronne For This Useful Post:
jhonny_v, lievas, stevin6, zodavand

The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Bronne For This Useful Post:
amfibia, bushmn05, captkerp, chandran1, garm, gefu2012, gudnasen, GundeSvan, jhonny_v, John Thomas, Krist, lievas, mondokane, nervous, rickmadden, stevin6, swimliketarzan, testme97, vittux, zodavand

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pedro the Fisherman For This Useful Post:
I_Love_Naked_Girls, jhonny_v

The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to Bronne For This Useful Post:
Blackadder, bushmn05, captkerp, chandran1, garm, gefu2012, gnyet, Groan, gudnasen, GundeSvan, jhonny_v, John Thomas, Krist, mondokane, nervous, rickmadden, Sr. Raro, stevin6, swimliketarzan, testme97, toenail, vittux, zodavand

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bronne For This Useful Post:
jhonny_v, zodavand