naked.wikia.com

[KarlMalone]

Well, its much appreciated from me. Thanks.

[madahab]

Originally Posted by slagboy

An imagination is good when I'm banging Denise Richards...for my elaborate filthy photo's that are right in front of me, I wanna see it all

wait, if you were banging Denise RIchards, instead of looking right in front of you, you'd be imagining something else? you are a strange dude!

anyway since we're all so lame and have no idea what is hot, why don't you post a few dozen examples of what you are talking about.

[slagboy]

The simple answer to that is that im a lazy **** and can't be arssed. Doesn't mean I can't criticize

The PC answer is that...oh...every picture nearly has been posted before at some point...so what's the point.

wait, if you were banging Denise RIchards, instead of looking right in front of you, you'd be imagining something else?

No, that was merely an example of something I would imagine, rather than some women with their privates censored out.

[crumpled]

Originally Posted by Klondike

Also, the point is there is this streaking club at hamilton and if i just tell you about it, you might not believe it. So I add pics so that you know I'm not just making it up.

Klondike

That's a good point, Klondike.

For me, sometimes the situation and context of the photos is what is erotic rather than the sight of the private parts themselves. Sure, an unblurred photo would be preferable to a blurred photo of the same event, but for me, a blurred photo of the right situation is preferable to an unblurred photo of a model posing for a photographer for a magazine or something to that effect.

[therocket]

Originally Posted by slagboy

The simple answer to that is that im a lazy **** and can't be arssed. Doesn't mean I can't criticize

Naturally slagboy everyone now thinks you're a tosser and a shit disturber.

You're also a bit retro - troll was the term that was used - because it's been ages since I have been to any forum where someone signs up just to be a jerk.

Originally Posted by slagboy

The PC answer is that...oh...every picture nearly has been posted before at some point...so what's the point.

If that's the PC answer - then you should take your bitter, miserable attitude and find a new hobby. Gardening might be nice. You can rail against the daisies all you want.

Keep up the good work Klondike, ignore the peanut gallery.

Cheers and Good Health

[flashphoto]

Hmmmmm. Did a search on "Slagboy". Can't find any posts.

Keep up the good work Klondike. Those of us who post very much appreciate it.

[slagboy]

Oooh, an attack. Goody.

Naturally slagboy everyone now thinks you're a tosser and a shit disturber.

Tosser is another word for wanker....wanker means a serial masturbator. I can willingly admit to this, and so can the rest of you.

Shit disturber? Define please? Then I'll anaylse the insult and see if it befits me or not.

You're also a bit retro - troll was the term that was used - because it's been ages since I have been to any forum where someone signs up just to be a jerk.

Unture, when there's something good to be said, I'll say it, and thats usually when I see some new pictures or vids that haven't been posted before. Rocketman's clothed/unclothed are usually outstanding. I don't like anything CFNM and I have said so, I also don't see any kind of titilation in pictures with censoring...and I've said so. Whether I post my own pics or not doesn't come into it. I don't post pics because I don't want to post pictures that have been seen a dozen times over and over and over...just as the group photos (2's, 3's, 4's etc) they are always the same and surely the duplication of them take up bandwidth. Every pic I see on a yahoo group or whatever has already been posted...and for your information, I have discovered some WNBR picture links that I shall be posting very soon.

If that's the PC answer - then you should take your bitter, miserable attitude and find a new hobby. Gardening might be nice. You can rail against the daisies all you want.

Bitter? I can assure you matey, that the only bitterness spouting forth is over at Naked Pedia, who know that censoring the private parts will halve their custom due to purist perverts like myself not being interested .

Keep up the good work Klondike

Klondike and I understand eachother, he respects that I have an opinion.

Hmmmmm. Did a search on "Slagboy". Can't find any posts.

Didn't search hard enough then did you. I've made loads of posts. If you mean posting pics, then no, it's not a requirement of this board, otherwise they wouldn't let people like me join. I've already explained my actions. But I have had the occaisonal pic or link.

[Klondike]

For the record, "naked pedia" did not censor the pics, nor were they posted there. The pics were found on a different website through a link at "naked pedia".

I would also argue that lots of pics deserve posting even if they are censored if the subject matter is unique or noteworthy. I'd never bother to post a typical am pic if it is censored - not when you can find hundreds more uncensored ones just like it. But these pics are the only ones I know of that show this streaking club. There is a lot of useful info in a pic like that - how many streakers, how many are women, what the women look like, etc. All of this goes into my memory banks when I'm out and about shooting pics for y'all. And you can bet that if ever I cover the Hamilton streaking club, I will post my pics UNCENSORED

Klondike

[slagboy]

...which denotes that you prefer them uncensored!!

Don't hate me for getting the title of the site wrong...

[Klondike]

Originally Posted by slagboy

...which denotes that you prefer them uncensored!!

Of course I never said I didn't. But when you only have censored pics, what do you do...?

Klondike