Someone explain the rules to them... - Page 2

A Lurker · #11 10-31-2004, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by menime123

thanks for posting
got any more pics?

Sure do...slightly over 80 overall. But somehow most leechers seem to prefer not to see the rest instead of coming out and saying "thanks", so you'll have to wait a little longer. Sorry...

A.L.

nothingman · #12 10-31-2004, 06:41 PM

Thanks. Good picks.

Abarine · #13 10-31-2004, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A Lurker

Sure do...slightly over 80 overall. But somehow most leechers seem to prefer not to see the rest instead of coming out and saying "thanks", so you'll have to wait a little longer. Sorry...

A.L.

I do understand your point, but I have to say, it would be a bandwidth killer if people who didn't post started thanking people. I think we even had a thread about not posting just to say thanks awhile back (I could be wrong, though).

I haven't posted anything in awhile, though, so I do see your point. Thanks for the Twister pics if you decide to post them.

Shan · #14 11-01-2004, 01:59 AM

Here, a ZIP file with all I have. No sucking up necessary.

0o9i8u7y · #15 11-01-2004, 03:34 AM

I think they should both be disqualified! If twister is going to have any chance to make it as a 2008 olympic sport, we need to stop this kind of mis-representa....

oh, I see, naked chicks...

mmmmmmm.... naaaked chiiicks.

A Lurker · #16 11-01-2004, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abarine

I do understand your point, but I have to say, it would be a bandwidth killer if people who didn't post started thanking people. I think we even had a thread about not posting just to say thanks awhile back (I could be wrong, though).

I haven't posted anything in awhile, though, so I do see your point. Thanks for the Twister pics if you decide to post them.

I surely don't want to kill any bandwidth with this procedure (and if there really is a thread somewhere proving my idea of making leechers showing a little gratitude wrong I will surely stop it immediately), but to be honest, what is more bandwidth-consuming? Leeching everything you can or beginning to get an idea of how posting here works and maybe in the future giving a little as well (and not just plain "thanks") instead of taking only? Seems to have worked with shan at least...

What is a little bit (or slightly more than just a little bit) frustrating is the fact that so far just about every 235. viewer of this post (as of November 1.) has felt he/she could get his/her fingers away from where-ever and reply...oh well.

Anyway, here's the next part of this game gone slightly wrong...errr...right...errr...well...whatever.

claysun69 · #17 11-01-2004, 07:21 PM

Can i spin the arrow next pllleeeeaaaassssseeee?!?!?!

Great series.....

Shan · #18 11-01-2004, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Seems to have worked with shan at least...

Well, you've got me there. Thanks for posting.

rewq449 · #19 11-02-2004, 10:04 AM

lurker her. I have always wanted to see the rest of that one. Thanks

Nanaki1777 · #20 11-03-2004, 08:07 AM

Thanks for posting. Great pics!

The Following User Says Thank You to Abarine For This Useful Post:
JesterJamez

The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Shan For This Useful Post:
annacondom, chi-town8080, chrisscross, DJoh8, EnterMan, fwperk, gbcrewman, JesterJamez, jimbojes, JPH, mastic

The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to A Lurker For This Useful Post:
bristolbhoy, chuckha62, Closetrednecj, dougsant, EnterMan, exotic_echo, gbcrewman, mastic, MTPL MN, noneya, old jer, publiclurker, riversidebob, teffub, that1

The Following User Says Thank You to Nanaki1777 For This Useful Post:
rmi1964