'Strip Poker' (USA Network, 1999-2000, Non-Nude)

[Rosenkavalier]

Originally Posted by Dookieman

At least when I saw this crap on USA network, they NEVER showed a good ass shot...like the girl would begin to turn around to show off her ass while pulling pants down...and they immediately cut away to one of the guys for their reaction. Bullshit. I eventually just gave up watching, because all that show did was piss me off with that.

There are several videos that I'll post where we get outstanding butt shots on the girls. But I do agree that it was the exception, rather than the rule. Also, on one of the games that I didn't end up keeping, the host made a comment (when he thought the mic was off) about how one girl was a "no-booty-shot" girl. So I took that to mean that some girls specified that they were not to be shot from behind, once they got down to a thong/g-string.

[Dookieman]

hah...silly broads...the "no-booty-shot!" rule is garbage, imo. Right then and there I would've just told them to get the hell off my set then. It's not like we're producing an award-winning movie or tv show here...the girls are there to look hot and strip down...so the way I see it, if she has certain "requirements", she could just go home and we'd get someone else who is down to show some ass. That's the way it should be. These producers and the like should take more of a hard line with this sort of thing....put their foot down.

[Rosenkavalier]

[Rosenkavalier]

[Rosenkavalier]

I don't have a lot of footage of Jennifer, but I do have this one bit. FYI - Very short.

[freddyquimby]

Thanks for posting these. I used to love this show Sadly, this is about as racy as it gets for American TV. And I bet it couldn't even get on the air these days. If it weren't for Howard Stern we'd never see a thong on basic cable anymore.

[Dookieman]

^yeah...the sad thing is...he's not exaggerating. On WWE Smackdown last week, they actually blurred a girl's ass in a thong. She had a thong on and they censored that! Pitiful. Just damn pitiful.

heh, I'm not trying to piss on the parade here, but one of those vidcaps reminded me of another annoying thing about that show...they "squeezed" or compressed the video while they rolled the credits. That sucks because it distorts the image of course...I want to see the women as they really are....not suddenly "stretched" tall due to screen-squeeze.

heh, that's enough whining/b*tchin/complaining from me on this...I'll shut up now.

[Rosenkavalier]

Originally Posted by Dookieman

heh, I'm not trying to piss on the parade here, but one of those vidcaps reminded me of another annoying thing about that show...they "squeezed" or compressed the video while they rolled the credits. That sucks because it distorts the image of course...I want to see the women as they really are....not suddenly "stretched" tall due to screen-squeeze.

heh, that's enough whining/b*tchin/complaining from me on this...I'll shut up now.

Nope, you're right -- the 'squeeze' was doubly annoying, since it usually happened right about the time we were getting the best views! (Then again, the 'disco' lighting meant that it was nearly impossible to get a good look anyway.) Of course, the sideways squeeze was better than the horizontal squeeze from the early, test-market-only episodes. I'll eventually post one of those, so you can see how bad it was.

[Rosenkavalier]

[Rosenkavalier]