Oregon State Library

[bcdave41]

Originally Posted by bcdave41

I love visiting Oregon : No sales tax, friendly people, and apparently so little crime that their law enforcement officers can spend their days trolling the internet for anything vaguely resembling criminal activity ...

Just wondering, though : For a charge of public indecency, doesn't that imply that some member of the public might actually be offended ?? I didn't notice any sign of anyone other than the perpetrator in the video (admittedly, my attention was firmly transfixed on said perp), so who, exactly, was offended ?? Was it only the State Trooper ??

A couple of suggestions : Perhaps the great state of Oregon could seek to employ officers who are not QUITE so prissy ... Or, if the State Trooper does happen to have such overly tender sensibilities, possibly he or she could refrain from seeking out materials that they do find offensive. Hey, I'm no Oregon State Trooper, but that's what I do !!

FREE KJS !!

(Of course, I'm referring to materials/activities that are victimless, involve consenting adults, and do not promote harm to others ... )

[dad1]

Not only was she not caught, but the clip demonstrates a keen awareness of not being seen by anyone in the library.

Anyone seeing her naked in the library is doing it by stumbling across her on a porn site, or seeking out the clip because they heard about it.

In both cases, the content isn't a surprise to the viewer.

What's more, I'd bet money that library is stocked with with a wide range of books on sexuality, and staffed by people who would scream bloody murder if this girl was taking pictures, in that same library, for a book that would sit on one of its shelves, but had to be removed for the sake of indecency.