Kate Middleton topless!

[LASERBLUETDI]

Originally Posted by mrbong

to be honest, these look like elaborate fakes. i think these are two very good but not quite perfect impersonators.

even allowing for the blurry distance lens, the first time i saw the pics i said "that's not Kate", face and hair all wrong.

it's also rather convenient that they seem to be in a perfect pose for the camera, even in a couple looking directly at the photographer.

nice lady, whoever it is, but i really don't think these are of the future Queen of England.

You could be Right! I Look at it this way: If that was you or I, getting photographed from a distance,loading up our cars with 'bags of cocaine' , the Photos's would NEVER Stand Up in a Court of Law in North America due to the Poor Quality.

[mrbong]

aha! i knew something wasn't quite right, and i have clocked what it is.

google "Kate Middleton smile". in every picture, you will see her lip curls upwards at the right. in all of these pictures she is shown with her lip curling up to the left.

it could be that it is just her special "holiday smile", similar to how it seems her neck shrinks and chin gets wider. oh, and William drops a few inches in height on holiday too, it seems. could be the French water.

[dixonervin05]

Poor Will - first his brother and now his wife exposed. Here's hoping that Grandma keeps her granny-panties on and away from the cameras! Lol

[gasb]

The editor of the French magazine that ran topless photos of Kate Middleton is suggesting she has SEX PHOTOS of the Royal couple in her possession but has decided not to run them ... yet.

Closer editor Laurence Pieau revealed the bombshell today while defending her decision to publish the topless pics of Kate ... saying "I won't hide the fact that there are more intimate pictures that exist that we haven't published and will not publish. These images are full of joy, not degrading."

She didn't specifically say sex pics ... but she didn't have to. It's pretty clear what she meant.

So why would she even tell the public about the unseen "intimate" photos?

She could be trying to paint herself as a heroic figure who SAVED the Royal fam from further humiliation ... or she just issued a thinly-veiled WARNING to Buckingham Palace: Back off the lawsuit, or else.

[onny]

Originally Posted by Stifmeister

Found these on the web...
This will be the future Queen of England.

Given the divorce rate in that most dysfunctional of families, that might not turn out to be the case.

[i love em old]

Agree that the pics could be any number of peoiple but as they are taking legal action and if you read through http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19604535 as well as numerous other news sites and there is no indication that the pics maybe fake I guess we can assume they're genuine

[mrbong]

Originally Posted by onny

Given the divorce rate in that most dysfunctional of families, that might not turn out to be the case.

Originally Posted by i love em old

Agree that the pics could be any number of peoiple but as they are taking legal action and if you read through http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19604535 as well as numerous other news sites and there is no indication that the pics maybe fake I guess we can assume they're genuine

Closer's editor said the couple were "visible from the street". a bit different from the earlier statement in which they were "taken from quite some distance with a telescopic lens". if these were taken from the street by a professional photographer then there's no reason at all for them to be this grainy, a look at the remainder of the threads on this voyeur section shows that.

fascinating if they are the real deal, but the quality, poses and curious distractions in the picture mean i am in no way convinced. it's a bit like that thing where people in Mexico or Bulgaria appear in newspapers when an image of the Virgin Mary appears on a piece of toast or in a tree - you see it because you've been told that's what you are looking at.

[malakabufo]

Pics such as these long distance grainy (yeah, I know that's not the proper term in the digital age, but you know what I mean) ones do very little for me. In fact, they probably hurt me as they make it less likely that my wife and other women will go topless on our next trip. She'll only get the point that topless = trouble, and I suspect many other women will feel the same way. It will reduce my voy opportunities for very little in return (except grainy long distance pics from a French magazine).

However, those of a certain age will no doubt recall the scandalous pics of Jackie O sunbathing nude on a Greek island which was probably owned by her then husband. Jackie O survived this scandal, and it happened back when it was really considered scandalous behavior.

I see a lawsuit has been filed. Stupid. It keeps the story alive and verifies that it is indeed her and not someone else.

They never listen to my advice for some reason.

[i love em old]

Originally Posted by mrbong

Closer's editor said the couple were "visible from the street". a bit different from the earlier statement in which they were "taken from quite some distance with a telescopic lens". if these were taken from the street by a professional photographer then there's no reason at all for them to be this grainy, a look at the remainder of the threads on this voyeur section shows that.

fascinating if they are the real deal, but the quality, poses and curious distractions in the picture mean i am in no way convinced. it's a bit like that thing where people in Mexico or Bulgaria appear in newspapers when an image of the Virgin Mary appears on a piece of toast or in a tree - you see it because you've been told that's what you are looking at.

Visible from the street though it doesn't say how far away the street is!!! I don't know enough about telephoto lenses to counter your arguement but I'm sure that if they were fake, The Palace would have said so by now.

[Bearclaw1959]

Originally Posted by Stifmeister

Found these on the web...
This will be the future Queen of England.

at least she knocked her sisters ass off the front page