Pedro's All New and Original Nude Beach Photos 2012 - Page 11

Pedro the Fisherman · #**101** 05-21-2012, 04:46 AM

Thanks Dixler, but I can see the point, some guys here might just start saying things like 'I will post nude shots of mywife/girlfriend/daughter

if you contribute x$ to my fund for a new car/camera/hi-fi! A line has to be drawn.

They have kindly said I can deal with the matter by PM, I will be looking into the PayPal side of things over the next few days. I will accept donations, but only once I have the video camera in action.

That way, people can see it is not a scam and I can then maybe give them an RS URL where I can upload 'bonus' footage not posted here. I will not be going totally video, it will be in addition to the stills (and be used when the still camera cannot cope with the heat), unless the video stills are useable?

Back to the hippy chicks....

the-obs · #**102** 05-21-2012, 04:56 AM

man ! these two hippies are sweet. Especially the first with the huge breast...
I'm not a fan of bust (As you know) but I find them really nice anyway.

parejatoledo · #**103** 05-21-2012, 05:04 AM

i like the bush pussy,

keep it up, you are the number one

dixler · #**104** 05-21-2012, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

Thanks Dixler, but I can see the point, some guys here might just start saying things like 'I will post nude shots of mywife/girlfriend/daughter

if you contribute x$ to my fund for a new car/camera/hi-fi! A line has to be drawn.

I can understand that. But you have a 4 year track record here and have posted thousands of pictures. You are an exceptional case.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

They have kindly said I can deal with the matter by PM, I will be looking into the PayPal side of things over the next few days. I will accept donations, but only once I have the video camera in action.

[/SIZE]

You do have a few other options. You could enter the monthly contest over at Voyeurweb and hope you win. They've really had some poor contributions recently. But, karennudist over there was complaining about not winning when he thought he should have (as did I), so it may not be a fair contest. You could also try to sell some of your pics to one of the various video sites out there. But, we here would never get to see them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

That way, people can see it is not a scam and I can then maybe give them an RS URL where I can upload 'bonus' footage not posted here. [/SIZE]

I don't think anyone would invest 4 years and hundreds of hours of their time devising a scam to get a camera. A scammer would aim a little higher.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

I will not be going totally video, it will be in addition to the stills (and be used when the still camera cannot cope with the heat), unless the video stills are useable?[/SIZE]

Some of those HD video cameras produce fantastic quality pictures from the still frames. A still frame from a HD video may not be as good as a single picture from an HD camera, but let's face it, a lot of cameras produce grainy pictures when taken at the highest resolution. Some of the pics are so grainy I shrink them down to get rid of the graininess. Bigger is not always better.

I took a look at some of itsmee's HD frame captures from his video and they look pretty good. Some of the images are a little "washed out", but that could be from being compressed to jpeg, or some other camera compression setting. In my opinion, video that you can get good pictures from is better than higher quality pictures with no video. You can't watch the boobs and butts jiggling on the beach in a still photo. But you will do what you think is best and what your camera is able to handle. Here's a gallery of stills from itsmee's videos. I think you will have to download them to get the full size, which is huge.

https://picasaweb.google.com/1098155...Pur0q-Fw62_uAE

The pictures are taken from video and look acceptable to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

Back to the hippy chicks....[/SIZE]

They are really sexy, except for what looked like some armpit hair on one of them. Hairy pussy, yes. Hairy armpits, shave it. They are good looking women. You are lucky to be able to see that right in front of your eyes on a public beach.

diegojmo · #**105** 05-21-2012, 07:29 AM

With permission of the participants give my opinion, I have camera and video cameras, the video picks up dust in the closet, I hate the video, because most of the times of some events Nonstop is not as fantastic as the photos , the photos capture a second time immortalized. -
For me the two best camera I've ever had and I have the Olympus Ultra Zoom is 765, still makes some fantastic photographs that has no image stabilizer and works in all circumstances (at least to me), is a camera with 14x optical magnification (increases disposable digital) mar the picture, the main drawback of this camera is that no stabilizer, you can buy very very cheap second hand between 100 � and 200 � depending on your state, you must put a protective lens to avoid ingress of dust, water, etc, is very cheap and does not affect the picture. -
And the second I bought a year ago is the 36x optical Nikon P500 has two stabilizers and works very well, the problem is that at 36x to get a good photo you need including the stabilizer tripod, if you do not have a pulse as the superman, considering you can get the photo to the registration of a car about 600 meters and see it perfectly, this also should be put a lens cap (in fact you should make all) but the problem is that
if you take a picture close you get a black fence around the guard because you do not happen to the Olympus, it is also more cumbersome and large and priced between 400 � and 500 � depending on where you buy it, in my case preferable to pay a little more but buy it in the English court, for the warranty you get. -
If the pictures you realize that Indicate to almost all have pastel colors distort, is typical of video cameras and some camera photos. -
For photos and in circumstances far removed to be fast, I always bring it into automatic everything, you can manually prepare the camera and when you get the picture moves the lens and aruino. -
After the step for some photo program and under the damage, by the way the grain is solved most of the time putting the iso in car, on a video camera can not do. -
Best regards and congratulations pedro a fantastic job.
Well this translated with google hope you mean and sorry for the billet

Quote:

Originally Posted by dixler

I can understand that. But you have a 4 year track record here and have posted thousands of pictures. You are an exceptional case.

You do have a few other options. You could enter the monthly contest over at Voyeurweb and hope you win. They've really had some poor contributions recently. But, karennudist over there was complaining about not winning when he thought he should have (as did I), so it may not be a fair contest. You could also try to sell some of your pics to one of the various video sites out there. But, we here would never get to see them.

I don't think anyone would invest 4 years and hundreds of hours of their time devising a scam to get a camera. A scammer would aim a little higher.

Some of those HD video cameras produce fantastic quality pictures from the still frames. A still frame from a HD video may not be as good as a single picture from an HD camera, but let's face it, a lot of cameras produce grainy pictures when taken at the highest resolution. Some of the pics are so grainy I shrink them down to get rid of the graininess. Bigger is not always better.

I took a look at some of itsmee's HD frame captures from his video and they look pretty good. Some of the images are a little "washed out", but that could be from being compressed to jpeg, or some other camera compression setting. In my opinion, video that you can get good pictures from is better than higher quality pictures with no video. You can't watch the boobs and butts jiggling on the beach in a still photo. But you will do what you think is best and what your camera is able to handle. Here's a gallery of stills from itsmee's videos. I think you will have to download them to get the full size, which is huge.

https://picasaweb.google.com/1098155...Pur0q-Fw62_uAE

The pictures are taken from video and look acceptable to me.

They are really sexy, except for what looked like some armpit hair on one of them. Hairy pussy, yes. Hairy armpits, shave it. They are good looking women. You are lucky to be able to see that right in front of your eyes on a public beach.

Pedro the Fisherman · #**106** 05-21-2012, 07:44 AM

The video camera was bought in response to the number of requests for video. It is also sometimes easier, you set the camera up, zoom in and once you hit 'record', you can leave it alone. Good to alay suspicions!

This camera also has a 'pause' in recording button I am hoping will allow it to run on standby, as the battery life appears to be 100 minutes, more than I currently get with the still camera. There really is no good still camera on the market that can cope with what I do, so this is an experiment.

As the camera is 'fixed' in it's hiding place, apart from touching the buttons to start and stop, I am hoping it will not wobble about, too. Maybe the style of shooting will be different, it's a case of try it and see. If all else fails, I'll sell it on E-bay!!

diegojmo · #**107** 05-21-2012, 08:01 AM

Well do not think you fail, some have a remote control or by cable or infrared to stop and resume, to other compatible batteries you can find a good price even with car charger, so while one is in use the other may be charged it is important to format and support and there is nothing that can fix all poderos photoshop or nothing lol

Someday learn English, at least to see if Google translates as an American Indian or an Amazonian Indian jajaj

Certainly the last great pictures, have better contrast, has gone the artificial fog that went out

Pedro the Fisherman · #**108** 05-22-2012, 04:42 AM

To those kind folks who have PM'd me about the camera fund, I will get back to you when I have tried out the new camera in a week or so.

On to todays' pics and we start to wind up the 'Hippy Chicks' set with a better view of that 'junglie' bush! She was quite young (early 20's) and had been walking around the beach in just a pair of shorts, looking for attractive pebbles.

On to a new subject tomorrow, then I will have to take a break, as I am away from the internet for a few days. Having said that, beach weather is returning, so I may get a visit in before I head into the mountains!

the-obs · #**109** 05-22-2012, 05:14 AM

more and more...fantasstics...

banedon76 · #**110** 05-22-2012, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

On to todays' pics and we start to wind up the 'Hippy Chicks' set with a better view of that 'junglie' bush! She was quite young (early 20's) and had been walking around the beach in just a pair of shorts, looking for attractive pebbles.

Beautiful! Fabulous! That wonderful, luxurious bush almost restores my hope in nude beaches!

If only this gorgeous, unashamed young woman could start a trend.

The Following 182 Users Say Thank You to Pedro the Fisherman For This Useful Post:
1rossgeller, A147SAN, abc123uandme, acetaminaphine, actiris, akivion, amantedell, anders37, antxon21, archiehillie, arizona27, astrogreek, ausguy, backagain, badduladdu, baggo, banedon76, barfet, barsuk, bigmac22, birdy69, brochenko, brunettesrule, carlos2500, casserres, chandran1, charly67, chillerwhale, clc100, clntnprts, cocktailking, comics, coprologist, crispus, cst.85, curly804, dadammerl, Daedelus, Dapicdirrt, darksky_2003, Dave998, daves22, daydayx, DC2k9, deppa, DiegoJames, diegojmo, dixler, dk_rm4, droop2005, ECUpirate, elcochino1, emeT, emilxxx, enripa, F-15c, fabianw, fkk2211, framis, fxavix, gfb4228, griffin5, gsxrparis, herr_Roald, hialt, hilocrc, hockeypuck, HondaBike, honeybadger, iamapizzavet, idajar, irish drunkard, jhonny_v, John Thomas, John2010, JohnDinoDamolsch, jondoestwo, juan_casas, junkieny, kaland, kappala, karl, KevinPlonker, kiln82, krumicek, larrycable69, leonidas22, leopoldo, Lesterlosabe, LR6778, Mahoney, manilius, marcopm93, Marginus, mate111, McGintys, megakuschel, mikered1, Mizzen, morningwood, mr EN, mucker888, natmovies, neil733, neilm24, nervous, ninja10, nitro, Oceanbreeze, ofsprey, pakiillo, pakitowest, palladin, parejatoledo, paressou1, patrick85, peepeerl, pepepalote, Perr, pete1027, pichunhunter, piedrolari, pilchard, plaid_mantis, portatile, prototype, quietones, ranafrosch, ratbol, rcf69, Renee1984, richardj74, rjorge, Romeo80, Romerales, Rufus the Red, schrox, sem71rus, shagz, shai696, shaveshave, SHERLOCK59, simonlintworm, sinverguenza, snoclwn, southside24, spartans, Sr. Raro, sserena, ssspender, stafer, stevepa999, stylo, sweendoggy, Tadashi, Teemu04, tetrak74, the-obs, TheBeef, tigger1197, tkb123, tobi78, toenail, trinpar, trotsi69, tuohy007, twocamille, tylergal, ukmav, unpocoloco, vayaputada, vezouvios_1, vittux, Wallaby Teed, wertox, Wildeye, wingbong, wissox, x1x, xp2, xterrabyte, zodavand

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to the-obs For This Useful Post:
jhonny_v, Pedro the Fisherman, xterrabyte

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to parejatoledo For This Useful Post:
jhonny_v, Pedro the Fisherman

The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to dixler For This Useful Post:
chandran1, fluffytail, grumpyoldgit, hilocrc, jhonny_v, Pedro the Fisherman, phatboi21, Romeo80, tbs24, xp2, xterrabyte, zodavand

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Pedro the Fisherman For This Useful Post:
antxon21, bppes, dixler, F-15c, griffin5, hilocrc, jhonny_v, Mizzen, ukmav

The Following 164 Users Say Thank You to Pedro the Fisherman For This Useful Post:
abc123uandme, acetaminaphine, actiris, akivion, anders37, antxon21, archiehillie, astrogreek, ausguy, avril, banedon76, barda, barfet, barsuk, birdy69, brochenko, brunettesrule, carlos2500, casserres, chandran1, charly67, clc100, clntnprts, coprologist, crispus, cst.85, curly804, dadammerl, Daedelus, darksky_2003, darude222, Dave998, daves22, daydayx, DC2k9, deppa, DiegoJames, diegojmo, digul8r, dixler, dk_rm4, droop2005, dugan, elcochino1, emeT, emilxxx, enripa, F-15c, fabianw, feelyatdacat, fkk2211, framis, freebeaches, fxavix, gfb4228, griffin5, Groan, grumpyoldgit, gussetmonkey, herr_Roald, hilocrc, HondaBike, honeybadger, iamapizzavet, irish drunkard, jakeyb2003, jana81muc, jhonny_v, John Thomas, John2010, JohnDinoDamolsch, juan_casas, junkieny, kaland, kappala, karl, KevinPlonker, ktxondo, larrycable69, leonidas22, Looker81, LR6778, Mahoney, Marginus, mate111, McGintys, megakuschel, mejican22, mikered1, Mizzen, morningwood, mr EN, natmovies, neil733, neilm24, nervous, ninja10, ofsprey, pampa666, paranzow, parejatoledo, paressou1, patrick85, pchiol2, peepeerl, pepepalote, Perr, pete1027, pichunhunter, piedrolari, pilchard, pioprio, plaid_mantis, portatile, prototype, quietones, ratbol, rcf69, Renee1984, richardj74, rjorge, Rufus the Red, saneladio, schrox, shagz, shai696, shaveshave, SHERLOCK59, shoarma, simonlintworm, sinverguenza, Spaceman5, spartans, Sr. Raro, sserena, ssspender, stafer, stylo, suave, sweendoggy, Tadashi, Teemu04, tetrak74, the-obs, TheBeef, theradioshack, tigger1197, toenail, trinpar, trotsi69, tuohy007, tylergal, ukmav, unpocoloco, vayaputada, vezouvios_1, vittux, wertox, Wildeye, wingbong, xp2, xterrabyte, zip007uk, zodavand

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to banedon76 For This Useful Post:
dixler, jhonny_v, McGintys, Pedro the Fisherman, xterrabyte