What is More Embarassing: Nude Pic or BJ Pic

[harrymooore88]

As our fighting men go off to war, American sweethearts often give their guys a picture as a keep sake to remember them while on the battlefield. Sometimes, these pictures get a bit risque.

Some girls may opt to provide a nude picture of herself. But she runs the risk that at some point it will be passed around the barracks and her treasures viewed by the whole company. How embarrassing. Is there an alternative?

Other girls may pose fully clothed but allow herself to photographed holding, or better yet sucking, her man's erect penis. As long as the man in confident in how well endowed he is, the girl is the only one embarrassed. Or is she?

What is more embarrassing for girls?

A. Having nude pictures of themselves shown to others.
B. Having clothed pictures of themselves holding or sucking their guys cock shown to others.
C. Equally embarrassing.

[SocialCapital]

Yes, there is the shown-in-action aspect of stolen or misused shots. I guess I don't get into them as much because they tend to have a big COCK in them. I'm not homophobic, but cocks just don't do it for me.

On a related note, knowing that the girl knows about the nude shots of her makes it more sexy. On the other hand, over the years I've had the privelage of owning nude shots of women that I know but who don't know I have them. That's exciting, too. If I had any of these anymore, I would post them. I've just lost them over the years.

[Sheb]

I'm not really sure how to answer this poll since I'm not a female...

but I'd think the BJ pic would be more embarassing....

also on a side note... I asked this question before but forgot what thread I asked in so wasn't ever able to read the answer..

I also have photo's I've taken of women I've known ... something like 50 or 60...
Have pondered posting them a few times, but am always filled with mixed feelings of both being scared and feeling guilty for breaking the trust of the person that let me take them in first place...

Have any of you guys that have posted pictures of ex's etc... Had any negative consequences from posting?
If you have... does it make a difference if you blur the face?

Kinda curious... since one set I'd never post, but there is another set that I've been thinking about.. since she's no longer in my life... and is generally a b*tch.

[Roxanne]

And THAT is why I keep saying nobody -- male or female -- should EVER pose naked for a lover or a spouse, "private, just for us Babe." There is no such thing as a private photo between spouses or lovers. Half the marriages end, and most of the relationships end. A huge number of them end badly.

Here is the proof:

Sheb has photos of a woman. Presumably she was fond of him at the time she posed. But then things went bad. He reports he may post her set of nude photos, because "she is no longer in his life, and she is a b*tch." She may not have been a b*tch when she posed, but now he is thinking of extracting revenge from her.

Roxanne

Originally Posted by Sheb

also on a side note... I also have photo's I've taken of women I've known ... Have pondered posting them a few times, but am always filled with mixed feelings of both being scared and feeling guilty for breaking the trust of the person that let me take them in first place...

Have any of you guys that have posted pictures of ex's etc... Had any negative consequences from posting?
If you have... does it make a difference if you blur the face?

Kinda curious... since one set I'd never post, but there is another set that I've been thinking about.. since she's no longer in my life... and is generally a b*tch.

[Roxanne]

Slacker68 provides reinforcement of the warning. If you don't want the whole wide world to see you naked, don't ever agree to pose for your boyfriend, girlfriend, husband or wife.

Roxanne

Originally Posted by slacker68

post em man no need for guilt and even less since shes a b*tch

[alphaboo]

It seems the very annoymous nature of the web makes posting of "Just for you" mateial much easier. Before the web there were people making nude videos and photos for each other but there was no easy way to desimminate them.

The web changed this.

But the truth is now if you don't want the photos posted for general consumption don't take them because there is always the chance they will be posted. If you take a nude photo you should take it with the realization that it will be posted.

It seems that younger women are more likely the victim of this because they are still in the stage of believing "it's forever and he really truly loves me and he's special and would never do that to me". Whether or not a younger or older woman would be more embrassed by it I don't know. Also since it's young men these young women date they seem more likely to post the photos or videos as a prank or revenge then older men by virtue of their youth. I don't know if it works the other way around as well.

Yet a recent TV car commercial reinforences this behavior where a young woman after she buy a car, because the car is so affordable, has enough money to buy a billboard with a naked photo of her old boyfriend. She and her female friend gigle about this. I doubt they would have the commercial show a man doing this. It would seem to be an act of abuse and not cute like when the woman does it. But it makes it seem the behavior is perfectly acceptable. It's cute or funny when the woman does it. However I find the commercial childish and thinks it says alot about America's attitude towards sex and nudity.

A big part of this problem does stems from the American attitude about sex and nudity. Americans are embrassed about both. In Europe where I lived for awhile this is not much of an issue.

But Roxanne is right, if you don't want your photo posted the only way to ensure this is to never take them in the first place.

AS to the morality of looking at such photos, I don't know. Since the material is posted it becomes a personal issue and I am sure we all have lines we don't cross and material we wouldn't look at. And in all honesty I enjoy looking at pictures of naked women, especially average everyday women instead of prissy pampered models and movie stars.

AS to the poll, I really don't think a woman should be embrassed by a naked photo as long as it's not done in a cruel way, such as "this is my ex the b*tch ha ha". If it's done as "wow she's hot" I see nothing to be embrassed about. However the woman herself would have to be the finale arbitrator of that. If a woman found out a photo of her had been posted here and asked it to be removed I would hope it would be.

AS to the other question, I think photos of sex acts are too intimate to look at.

So I really couldn't vote.

[SocialCapital]

Alphaboo and Roxanne both make good points. There's a thread that's really happening right now in Sexy Ams filled with women shot of film, which means that most of the photos were taken before the internet, at a time when, at most, your ex bf was going to show your nude pictures to his friends. So, when you look at those pictures, there's a definite sense of increased intimacy--these are *really* private photos.

I agree with Roxanne's advise for people about posing nude in any circumstance other than someone who likes the idea of millions of others seeing them naked. I must confess, though, that I'm glad that millions of women have made the mistake. A big part of the turn-on for me as a viewer of ex-gf photos, is the humiliation factor. Same reason I like ENF. I recognize this as a kinky way of being, but I think it's part of human nature to intertwine sex with power. That's not to excuse it, but to explain it.

[Jessica Savage]

Modern electronic techniques have removed the entire concept of "posing" for photos. THOUSANDS OF WOMEN have had the world seen them not only nude of giving a bj, but being undressed to their most intimate Victoria's Secrets and working it A to Z with their guys. AND for every set of pics that gets posted to the internet, there are probably 10 sets that are still not posted and shown to friends, brothers, etc. I'll bet there are now over 10,000 women who have been and are being "secretly humiliated" as they go to parties, weddings or to the supermarket, and guys they see there know every naked truth about them.

Jes

[harrymooore88]

I think once you eliminate the strippers, nudists, exhibitionists, nude sun bathers, and professional models, you are left with 85% of the female population. Most of these women have issues with their naked body and have a hard enough time just finding a bathing suit that covers their perceived faults. They make love in the dark so they are not easily seen. They are modest, shy, and embarrassed about being nude. They don't want anyone seeing what they feel are their small boobs, sagging boobs, hariy bush, big ass, etc. whether it is true or not.

Remember, Pamela Anderson is not affraid of being photographed nude, but then again, she is PAMELA ANDERSON! Most women do not come even close.

If you get past the point that a BJ is a sex act (just like Bill Clinton believes), holding a guys dick is like shaking his hand. Sucking it is like a kiss on the mouth. The new surveys say that high schoolers feel oral sex is the new "third base" and less intimate than vaginal intercourse.

Thus, I feel most women are more embarrassed to be seen naked than they are to be seen sucking a dick.

[klex]

I think that alot of women finds the act of a bj humilliating.
so when every one know about that the humilliation part
gets alot stronger.
think about it , whats easier to convince a girl
to see her naked or getting a bowjob