|
Our forum has over 13 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!
|
|
|
Our forum has over 13 million
photos, videos and .ZIP files.
uploaded by our members!
|
|
#1
01-06-2009, 10:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Shaved vintage babes
Some rare shaved vintage babes, have more if everyone likes
|
| The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to tadalafil For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#2
01-06-2009, 10:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
few more
|
| The Following 32 Users Say Thank You to tadalafil For This Useful Post: | ||
actiris, asscinc, avispon, bald_69, butt_lvr, charlieee, Closetrednecj, crabbing, cthulhu, dandd, docmike1, doug.park, galahad39, ghettybooty, ipuss_, jbellen, jill8, jools1, KY_BOB, LuvsDaBoobies, madahab, Maduro 2000, mariagiovanna, nitro, paddyjoe4, retainedstatue, Richard53, sabberer, Sinister Minister, ssspender, Tek, tweetybroad | ||
|
#4
01-06-2009, 01:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting thread, though I suspect most of these models are airbrushed, and not shaven. If not technically illegal, it was generally considered taboo to show female pubic hair, until roughly the 1970's (in the US, anyway).
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to lonmol For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#5
01-06-2009, 03:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think so - at least, not for most of these. When I was a teenager (in the 60s, UK) I used to see lots of 'glamour' photos which definitely had been airbrushed. All you could see was a neat V of skin between the legs, a bit like a classical statue. None of them had visible bits and bobs like these have. Possibly it was different in the US, but I think there was a definite distinction in those days between 'glamour' shots (they would have been called porn then, but not now), and the harder stuff that showed actual genitalia. Certainly, in my youth I would never have seen stuff like this in a magazine you could buy freely. I doubt if anyone, US or UK, would go to the trouble of airbrushing out pubic hair but leaving in the labia. In fact, in my experience, a shaven pussy was possibly even more indecent than a hairy thatch, which at least hid the really naughty bits
 On another note, weren't they all sturdy girls in those days? You wouldn't pick a fight with any of them.
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Richard53 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#7
01-06-2009, 05:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the info
few more then...
|
| The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to tadalafil For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#8
01-06-2009, 06:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
more yet
|
| The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to tadalafil For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#9
01-06-2009, 07:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to jr8x For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#10
01-06-2009, 11:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...2&d=1231284574 https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...3&d=1231284574 https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/atta...4&d=1231284574 What a lovely girlie.  Thanks Fango
__________________
If you have any questions about the rules or Moderation decisions, please start a thread in the Site Feedback & Support section, rather than sending me a Private Message. If you need a post to be removed or edited, please report the post, rather than sending me a Private Message. Thank you.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
