04-08-2023, 05:26 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,105
Thanks: 16,665
Thanked 270,768 Times in 15,826 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLP00
True that! That's yet another reminder of my aging though. 
I couldn't help but notice you've just posted textbook examples of the three things that made high-cuts the sexiest underwear ever. If I had to explain to younger guys why these were amazing it'd be;
Exhibit 1, left: making women's legs look much longer, 'legs-for-days'.
Exhibit 2, center: making women's butts look bigger yet not fat, just kind of 'longer', these panties were often so snug that also gave their bums a lovely 'bubbliness' modern low-cuts fail to achieve.
Exhibit 3, right: enhancing women's waist-to-hip ratio into that sweet 'hornet waist' without looking unnaturally thin.
It seems they've been making sort of a comeback lately, but with smaller seats a la Brazilian bikinis. Lovely, but I prefer the classic 1990s full butt coverage bikini brief much more. I'm just weird like that. |
Katie and Laura's satin panties. This company makes hi-cut satin panties, based on the 80's/90's styles, and their models are so beautiful, they make Victoria's Secret look like The Kennel Club.
Last edited by lonmol; 04-08-2023 at 05:32 PM.
|
