Underwear Ads

[lonmol]

Underwear ads. ...

[lonmol]

Underwear ads.. .. .

[lonmol]

. ... .Underwear ads

[lonmol]

Underwear ads. ... ...

[lonmol]

. U nderwear ads.

[lonmol]

Underwear ads..

[lonmol]

Under wear ads

[lonmol]

Underwear ad s.

[FLP00]

Originally Posted by lonmol

To be fair, the people calling them granny panties today, probably have grandmothers who DO wear hi-cut bikini panties. Here's a collage that clearly illustrates the difference between the two styles.

True that! That's yet another reminder of my aging though.

I couldn't help but notice you've just posted textbook examples of the three things that made high-cuts the sexiest underwear ever. If I had to explain to younger guys why these were amazing it'd be;

Exhibit 1, left: making women's legs look much longer, 'legs-for-days'.

Exhibit 2, center: making women's butts look bigger yet not fat, just kind of 'longer', these panties were often so snug that also gave their bums a lovely 'bubbliness' modern low-cuts fail to achieve.

Exhibit 3, right: enhancing women's waist-to-hip ratio into that sweet 'hornet waist' without looking unnaturally thin.

It seems they've been making sort of a comeback lately, but with smaller seats a la Brazilian bikinis. Lovely, but I prefer the classic 1990s full butt coverage bikini brief much more. I'm just weird like that.

[FLP00]

More 1990s high-cuts because why not