Photos of Naked Charity Calendars

[bobjones001]

[wsstss]

Originally Posted by bobjones001

Attachment 11018617 Attachment 11018618
Attachment 11018619 Attachment 11018620
Attachment 11018621 Attachment 11018622
Attachment 11018623

There are more great pics on the website https://www.happyinXmyskin.today/ but I can't download to share here. Can anyone help?

[636387]

Originally Posted by wsstss

There are more great pics on the website https://www.happyinXmyskin.today/ but I can't download to share here. Can anyone help?

Here are a few pulled down in full resolution, any specific ones you think need retrieving?

[ewokalypse]

Lightened.

[ficidici]

Originally Posted by maxdelmax

So I tried pretty hard to get the St AnXdrews Sports StripXPed pics but was unsuccessful. I got through their silly system of purchasing them but ultimately they refused to sell to someone that was not affiliated with the school in some way. I decided not to remind them that we’ve already seen everything in the proofs they’ve made public.

It seems so silly they wouldn't sell the photos, it's reduced the amount they can raise for their cause. Anyway I had a go at removing the text in one of the photos using photoshop. I created a new layer and typed over the text (luckily they have used default photoshop font) then created a mask and blended the two layers and changed the transparency until the text was no longer visible. Essentially getting the text to match the underlying colour. There were a few artifacts remaining which I tried to clean up a bit. I've attached the result and the original for compariosn. I assume as we didn't classify the text as a watermark (no copyright info or instruction not to copy) this is acceptable to post but Mods please remove if not. I may have a go at doing a couple more if anyone is interested. Took about an hour in total to get it how I wanted so can't do the whole set or anything.

[BareAll]

Originally Posted by ficidici

It seems so silly they wouldn't sell the photos, it's reduced the amount they can raise for their cause. Anyway I had a go at removing the text in one of the photos using photoshop. I created a new layer and typed over the text (luckily they have used default photoshop font) then created a mask and blended the two layers and changed the transparency until the text was no longer visible. Essentially getting the text to match the underlying colour. There were a few artifacts remaining which I tried to clean up a bit. I've attached the result and the original for compariosn. I assume as we didn't classify the text as a watermark (no copyright info or instruction not to copy) this is acceptable to post but Mods please remove if not. I may have a go at doing a couple more if anyone is interested. Took about an hour in total to get it how I wanted so can't do the whole set or anything.

that's very impressive. i don't understand the technicalities of how that's possible but well done.

these two are the ones i'd like to see most without the lettering

what's really really odd, is when i save these two photos and look at the thumbnails, i can't see the lettering!! can anyone explain that?

[maxdelmax]

Originally Posted by ficidici

I may have a go at doing a couple more if anyone is interested. Took about an hour in total to get it how I wanted so can't do the whole set or anything.

great job Ficidici! PLEASE do some more of these for us! And probably as you go along you will get a lot faster at it so that it won't be so time consuming.

[wsstss]

Originally Posted by 636387

Here are a few pulled down in full resolution, any specific ones you think need retrieving?

Thanks 636387 - those pics are amazing Wish I knew how you did it.

All the clear pics would be brilliant. The arty ones are a waste of time

[answer12]

Originally Posted by BareAll

what's really really odd, is when i save these two photos and look at the thumbnails, i can't see the lettering!! can anyone explain that?

I can explain this, when you take a photo your camera will add EXIF information to the photo, describing the size/resolution, sometimes the camera's brand, maybe a geolocation, and a lower resolution thumbnail. As long as that EXIF thumbnail isn't replaced or removed the original image will stay on the thumbnail.

In this case, the original thumbnail wasn't replaced so it doesn't have the lettering.

Most image uploading sites will remove this EXIF information, but about a decade ago I found photobucket didn't remove it (they probably do now), so I'd find "censored" pictures where someone would take a naked photo but they'd photoshop over the nudity, but the thumbnail wouldn't be censored

[medkek24]

Originally Posted by answer12

I can explain this, when you take a photo your camera will add EXIF information to the photo, describing the size/resolution, sometimes the camera's brand, maybe a geolocation, and a lower resolution thumbnail. As long as that EXIF thumbnail isn't replaced or removed the original image will stay on the thumbnail.

In this case, the original thumbnail wasn't replaced so it doesn't have the lettering.

Most image uploading sites will remove this EXIF information, but about a decade ago I found photobucket didn't remove it (they probably do now), so I'd find "censored" pictures where someone would take a naked photo but they'd photoshop over the nudity, but the thumbnail wouldn't be censored

Yeah its a known bug in older versions of Adobe Lightroom that the thumbnail didn't have the watermark. See feedback.photoshop . com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom-watermark-omitted-from-embedded-thumbnails-of-exported-jpegs

Nothing of value to be exported though since its very low resolution

Here are some I had a go at a while ago.
Sloppy work but idk