BRIT THREAD - Page 364

Icantasteit · #**3631** 12-22-2016, 04:22 AM

Tracey of Wales

reachforit · #**3632** 12-22-2016, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icantasteit

Tracey of Wales

I would love to see more of her

sharky_1168 · #**3633** 12-22-2016, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icantasteit

Soorat of Stoke

Truly gorgeous young lady, any more?

hot_rabbit · #**3634** 12-22-2016, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Icantasteit

Tracey of Wales

there is more to Wales than just sheep

vancey · #**3635** 12-23-2016, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phonestuff

IF it goes through, which could take a couple of years, then it's the end for anyone in UK posting content.

Until then, share away.

From a legal perspective, I'm a professional, obviously no details, the law is VERY clear, you have to disclose with the intention of causing distress. If there is no evidence of disclosure with the intent to cause distress, quite simply there is no case to answer. Additionally there is an additional protection in paragraph 8:-
(8)A person charged with an offence under this section is not to be taken to have disclosed a photograph or film with the intention of causing distress merely because that was a natural and probable consequence of the disclosure.

This is not an area they can really close down too much generally in law because it will rapidly start moving into areas of free speech and expression and also copyright. There is already protection for if the person in the photos received 'reward', so that solidly protects anybody paying.

---
Disclosing private sexual photographs and films with intent to cause distress

(1)It is an offence for a person to disclose a private sexual photograph or film if the disclosure is made�

(a)without the consent of an individual who appears in the photograph or film, and

(b)with the intention of causing that individual distress.

-----
(8)A person charged with an offence under this section is not to be taken to have disclosed a photograph or film with the intention of causing distress merely because that was a natural and probable consequence of the disclosure.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...ion/33/enacted

Don Jon · #**3636** 12-23-2016, 05:04 PM

...sounds like good news!

Austcoop · #**3637** 12-23-2016, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vancey

From a legal perspective, I'm a professional, obviously no details, the law is VERY clear, you have to disclose with the intention of causing distress. If there is no evidence of disclosure with the intent to cause distress, quite simply there is no case to answer. Additionally there is an additional protection in paragraph 8:-
(8)A person charged with an offence under this section is not to be taken to have disclosed a photograph or film with the intention of causing distress merely because that was a natural and probable consequence of the disclosure.

This is not an area they can really close down too much generally in law because it will rapidly start moving into areas of free speech and expression and also copyright. There is already protection for if the person in the photos received 'reward', so that solidly protects anybody paying.

---
Disclosing private sexual photographs and films with intent to cause distress

(1)It is an offence for a person to disclose a private sexual photograph or film if the disclosure is made�

(a)without the consent of an individual who appears in the photograph or film, and

(b)with the intention of causing that individual distress.

-----
(8)A person charged with an offence under this section is not to be taken to have disclosed a photograph or film with the intention of causing distress merely because that was a natural and probable consequence of the disclosure.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...ion/33/enacted

Boy, do you know how to kill an erection. Came here for a wank, ended up getting a lecture on the law..

blub44uk · #**3638** 12-24-2016, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vancey

From a legal perspective, I'm a professional, obviously no details, the law is VERY clear, you have to disclose with the intention of causing distress. If there is no evidence of disclosure with the intent to cause distress, quite simply there is no case to answer. Additionally there is an additional protection in paragraph 8:-
(8)A person charged with an offence under this section is not to be taken to have disclosed a photograph or film with the intention of causing distress merely because that was a natural and probable consequence of the disclosure.

This is not an area they can really close down too much generally in law because it will rapidly start moving into areas of free speech and expression and also copyright. There is already protection for if the person in the photos received 'reward', so that solidly protects anybody paying.

---
Disclosing private sexual photographs and films with intent to cause distress

(1)It is an offence for a person to disclose a private sexual photograph or film if the disclosure is made�

(a)without the consent of an individual who appears in the photograph or film, and

(b)with the intention of causing that individual distress.

-----
(8)A person charged with an offence under this section is not to be taken to have disclosed a photograph or film with the intention of causing distress merely because that was a natural and probable consequence of the disclosure.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...ion/33/enacted

Interesting ! Thanks for this

moonfrog · #**3639** 12-31-2016, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukgent2

Has any one got more of this sexy women

She posts on another site as Tynesidecpl. Very hot lady.

gazzanic · #**3640** 01-01-2017, 12:03 AM

like......

The Following 82 Users Say Thank You to Icantasteit For This Useful Post:
0nj, abr1, Air Defender, arnoldziffel, Babbage52, bbuk59, Beemer1960, big bobo, billibob, bristolbhoy, Careculo, celticcunnie, cheshire69, clc100, Closetrednecj, coach555, costaken, Cowsley, danny4, dayride49, deeadmirer, densmitty, DodgyLurgy, domhertsman, Don Jon, dustrbd, Englisht, femboxer, fuzzy121, geeo, giltar, guadzap, hobgoblin56, hot_rabbit, howard moon, hubkinky, iridium101, JakeBullet, james1705, jd54, Jem Casey, jimherts2003, Jonmob, joost5, kartman, Kathi33bi, kimandchris, lazyrus, lickertits2, licker_mum, likeemtight14, lucentimage, markandjoan, mastic, mickm50, mrkipling75, mrtoadface, mue1893, north.uk.cpl, Ondeugend, onenight, oweri, parker_688, pk1729, poumcat, Proud Fart, reachforit, robertave, sdcollingwood, Selmer, sharky_1168, Snowy Malone, somatic54, spudg, stoney, Stretcher1, thegit, tjn357, trafficwarden, Upforit200891, willieg, Yorkie1

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to reachforit For This Useful Post:
Cowsley, sharky_1168, thegit

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sharky_1168 For This Useful Post:
reachforit, thegit

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to hot_rabbit For This Useful Post:
LTPGeorge, Proud Fart, thegit

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to vancey For This Useful Post:
arnoldziffel, blub44uk, goldleader, Icantasteit, Masterful3, postmanuk, thefergieferg1, thegit, twokings

The Following 57 Users Say Thank You to Don Jon For This Useful Post:
0nj, annacondom, Areolaman1, Babbage52, bbdubluv45, bbuk59, Beemer1960, big bobo, blub44uk, bristolbhoy, celticcunnie, choosey88, clc100, Closetrednecj, coach555, Cowsley, danny4, dazza2, densmitty, dickead, DRDavenport, dustrbd, Englisht, Erador, fuzzy121, gatting, geeo, guadzap, jd54, Jem Casey, Jonmob, kartman, kimandchris, knobster, lickertits2, licker_mum, likeemtight14, Luechow, markandjoan, mastic, mickm50, mue1893, Ondeugend, parker_688, pk1729, poumcat, Proud Fart, rasclart, rizzi, sapped, sharky_1168, thegit, timsthreesons, tjn357, topbloke69, trafficwarden, twokings

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Austcoop For This Useful Post:
hairyarse, Icantasteit, Jonmob, pantythief, reachforit, zenith

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to blub44uk For This Useful Post:
greylensman02, Jonmob, poumcat, xmaster

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to moonfrog For This Useful Post:
mastic, Proud Fart

The Following 60 Users Say Thank You to gazzanic For This Useful Post:
0nj, abr1, antprice, Babbage52, bbuk59, BBWorshiper_UK, Beemer1960, Bellatrix, big bobo, bristolbhoy, captbobwi123, celticcunnie, choosey88, christianto, clc100, Closetrednecj, coach555, costaken, Couple6872, danny4, Diskret, dodgeram_3, Don Jon, Englisht, flumer, fuzzy121, geeo, guadzap, hardnhornycov, hnn, hobgoblin56, hubkinky, inckubus29, JakeBullet, Jem Casey, Jonmob, kartman, Kathi33bi, Kinkydude21, knobster, licker_mum, likeemtight14, markandjoan, mastic, mickm50, MM777M, mue1893, Ondeugend, phil121067, pieper03, pk1729, poumcat, Proud Fart, robinshood, sharky_1168, snowhound, somatic54, tjn357, tk8205, treefree