Kate Middleton topless!

Stifmeister · #1 09-14-2012, 08:07 AM

Found these on the web...
This will be the future Queen of England.

burgh15251 · #2 09-14-2012, 08:49 AM

If the technology that existed today was around 20 years ago....guaranteed we have been seeing topless pics of Princess Diana on a forum like this too.

Pedro the Fisherman · #3 09-14-2012, 09:03 AM

A lot of rubbish about nothing, she is just a woman after all and they all look pretty much the same at that range. Press Leeches will do anything for money, that's why I do it for free!!!!

hugopalm · #4 09-14-2012, 09:40 AM

Big deal. The picture quality is so horrible they should'nt even of been printed. I guess French photographers have alot of free time.

Franky Woods · #5 09-14-2012, 10:58 AM

Williams a lucky boy, I just wish the press (Gutter) would leave them alone.

LASERBLUETDI · #6 09-14-2012, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hugopalm

Big deal. The picture quality is so horrible they should'nt even of been printed. I guess French photographers have alot of free time.

The Photo's are Horrible because they were taken from a GREAT Distance with what is probably a Good Camera.

The 'press' don't usually use cheap cameras.

mrbong · #7 09-14-2012, 01:24 PM

to be honest, these look like elaborate fakes. i think these are two very good but not quite perfect impersonators.

even allowing for the blurry distance lens, the first time i saw the pics i said "that's not Kate", face and hair all wrong.

it's also rather convenient that they seem to be in a perfect pose for the camera, even in a couple looking directly at the photographer.

nice lady, whoever it is, but i really don't think these are of the future Queen of England.

Mudbug · #8 09-14-2012, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrbong

to be honest, these look like elaborate fakes. i think these are two very good but not quite perfect impersonators.

even allowing for the blurry distance lens, the first time i saw the pics i said "that's not Kate", face and hair all wrong.

it's also rather convenient that they seem to be in a perfect pose for the camera, even in a couple looking directly at the photographer.

nice lady, whoever it is, but i really don't think these are of the future Queen of England.

Actually, it seems to be true!
Follow the link: https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/show...postcount=9921

Mudbug

ouragan · #9 09-14-2012, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro the Fisherman

A lot of rubbish about nothing, she is just a woman after all and they all look pretty much the same at that range. Press Leeches will do anything for money, that's why I do it for free!!!!

That's why we love you, Fisherman! : )

mrbong · #10 09-14-2012, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mudbug

Actually, it seems to be true!
Follow the link: https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/show...postcount=9921

Mudbug

A royal source initially said the couple was "disappointed and saddened" and would consider legal action if the photos turned out to be genuine.

William looks a bit too short in the pictures. i stand to be corrected, but these look like rather well done fakes.

the only reason the British newspapers would turn these down - and they would have show edited versions to "expose a security breach" - was that they thought they were fake.

The Following 155 Users Say Thank You to Stifmeister For This Useful Post:
aayla1801, actiris, adf23, adior8otos, aguila_24, Anthony63, antxon21, backspace, bam2929, bananeros, banjoman1225, bardone6969, behre2k, berking123, bigmac22, boobmanxxx, bristolbhoy, Bruno4841, burgh15251, butterman, camel08, carlotta0001, ceb1, charly07, chovik, ClayRegazzoni, cornishman, Couple6872, daburn, DeinFreundin, discusgr, docmike1, Doisu, donker, drewpf2002, eastworld, elyobo, fastfrank, fbpres110, ffrayban1, firstwnat, flpeeper, flstfi55, Frankieboy_0, fraps, friarfrat, frufru, germanjack, glass, greendoor, Groan, hilocrc, ilikedirt, incense, Iron280, ishowwife, jds122567, jobnsb, Joeortega, Joetal, John Thomas, John2010, JPH, jumpinjive, karode, karp, kirori, knightnight, kp1234, lapeer25, leper, lfergu11, lilslip33, lonmol, manicade, Master Bonzo, maymedson11, mbufordx, michmc, millertime22, mim, missionbrk, MitchCumstein, ml8vin, monason, monyok, Mrs Dalloway, MrWinkus, m_blind, NaturallyExcited, ncal101, nerven80, Newty81, nnfan, noiserocker, norwood, O.S.F.P, old jer, oldbuckeye, ondgo321, outlaw53, petex, pingman62301, planoupla, pr1, Probert24, quitemaybe, ralphi, ratbol, rcf69, red101867, s2k3, SamH, samspensir, saniman, sar1f, savaged, scooby69, seamus24, seeker, shil85, SimonTabs, slammerkin, sleazy joe, sserena, Strachan, streti, strollerr, sweettongue, texwiller, therealmoec, thredkamel, tjn357, TommyStgt, tonstu04, TosunPasha, tplumrid, tranentlad, trexx, turboman, tvillecasper, twocamille, VancouverPervert, Verdun, vezouvios_1, vhunter, WhizdBiz2, whosurdaddy, WitchFinder, wolf775, x1x, z1z2z3, zarh, ZigZag, zipp21

The Following User Says Thank You to burgh15251 For This Useful Post:
TosunPasha

The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to Pedro the Fisherman For This Useful Post:
Aulritta, Billhook, Buddy I Con, Corporal Jones, craigc, elcochino1, glass, hilocrc, irish drunkard, ishowwife, ivanb, Jorge1e1, mannide, ofsprey, ouragan, quitemaybe, Rufus the Red, simonlintworm, stauncie, texpistol, TosunPasha, vezouvios_1

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to hugopalm For This Useful Post:
charly07, mtnhiker, quitemaybe, texpistol, TosunPasha

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Franky Woods For This Useful Post:
chiguy_38, texpistol, TosunPasha

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to LASERBLUETDI For This Useful Post:
fbpres110, texpistol, TosunPasha

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mrbong For This Useful Post:
fbpres110, quitemaybe, texpistol, TosunPasha, warmrain

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mudbug For This Useful Post:
quitemaybe, ratbol, TosunPasha

The Following User Says Thank You to ouragan For This Useful Post:
TosunPasha

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mrbong For This Useful Post:
df2385, TosunPasha