[jc666]

Originally Posted by kingdavid

Just expressing MY opinion...if you feel otherwise ...fine. I shoot totally NAKED women all the time in my
Ladies Lockerroom HD Series....so I personally am all good. .

But this idiotic America culture of ours has NOT CHANGED. It is incredibly depressing !!

Funny NOW even on the new MPA ratings for movies these days...there is a NEW disclaimer..." Rear MALE Nudity "..
put into a few of the new movies warnings !! CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS ???? I guess if there was a bare FEMALE
butt in the same movie...it would be just NUDITY...warn your children !!
Yet it's " ok " ( or humorous ...ok for the whole family ) to show male bare butts...but it is " risque " or " adult "
to show FEMALE butts ??!!!

That kind of thinking ...like the above calendar ( women/ bikini...men / naked )...makes me wanna PUKE.
VERY DISTURBING.

Sorry, I was just being flippant rather than dismissive. I agree with you to a point. These double standards annoy me to, though not so much when they are applied to charity calendars which let's not forget are just a bit of fun.

That "Rear Male Nudity" business is just weird, but remember the MPAA is by it's nature stupid and hypocritical. Have you seen that documentary "This Movie Is Not Yet Rated" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0493459/) which is an expose of the MPAA? It talks about the very same thing you mention, such as a few years back if the studio wanted a PG13 rating for "Solaris" it was OK to show the lead actress' bum, but if they left in George Clooney's it would have to be R rated (guess what the studio did...). I mean what is that all about? Pretty sick, what?