View Single Post
  #7  
Old 05-18-2010, 10:23 AM
eaze187's Avatar
eaze187 eaze187 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 353
Thanks: 432
Thanked 3,637 Times in 234 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moparnut View Post
Although I voted yes as well, I completely agree with littlep. Just depends on the intent of the woman. I really don't understand why a woman who willfully shaves bald (or close enough) would not realize that this is what happens and then choose to go out in public looking like she's clueless and/or embarrassed about it. That said, maybe there's a little exhibitionist in every woman deep down. (Insert jokes here.)
I obviously voted yes also, in defense of the camel toe shot I will say this; I have seen many an intentional oops shot (i.e. c-thru material etc.) but I can not say that I have seen an intentional camel toe. In NYC, c-thru is not a trend but in LA this is not true at all, not only have I seen this with my own eyes but I have also been told by women that in LA wearing a tank top with no bra is not a big deal because everyone does it and that it is "more European" in LA vs NYC. That being said, the camel toe is a constant problem and I have heard many a girl complain about it in regards to wearing bikini's. Furthermore, I have worked in graphic design and next to blemishes, the CT is next on the list of things to be air brushed for glamor shots and there is even leg positions that models use to avoid it (this is why the camel toe shot is usually only in the paparazzi shots or the test shots because the model is not in position.) So in my opinion, chicks care less about a c-thru nip shots than a CT shot and I don't think there have ever been any intentional camel toe shots, so I say its an Oops.

Last edited by eaze187; 05-18-2010 at 10:30 AM.
Reply With Quote