View Single Post
  #31  
Old 03-31-2005, 06:37 PM
jogle7's Avatar
jogle7 jogle7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 295
Thanks: 27
Thanked 2,383 Times in 204 Posts
Default Suzi Rocks

I agree with what you say Adigger767, but this was actually a hard case for the developer (High Voltage). They claimed over and over, even at E3 I believe, that there would be full nudity, with at least 15 girls. Come down to it, the ESRB REFUSES to give an M rating to any nudity below the waist! (The ESRB is a bunch of soccer moms who get to review games and give ratings). So, without censorship, an AO rating was assured, problem with that is it won't be carried by the majority of major distributors (Target, Walmart, EB, Gamestop). So the developer had no choice but to censor. If you notice on the uncensored version, it is rated AO (which is absolutely RIDICULOUS, as AO is as 'bad' a rating is possible, and there's not even any sex!), which even though hugely frowned upon, was a unique case in which an option was given of which game to buy, and I believe it was used to see how popular such releases would be with us american consumers. I think it was only allowed (by Sierra) because of the huge popularity of the uncensor patch which was available for the original version. Even though what you say is true, the uncensored version is a huge step towards allowing unsuppressed game design freedom, now the ESRB needs to realize how unfair they are being.

Sorry, but I had to give the full story (my opinionated version )

Now, for some Suzi Rocking in the buff
Enjoy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SuziRocks1.JPG (24.8 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg SuziRocks2.JPG (23.6 KB, 51 views)
File Type: jpg SuziRocks3.JPG (21.0 KB, 52 views)
File Type: jpg SuziRocks4.JPG (25.3 KB, 45 views)
Attached Files
File Type: wmv SuziRocks.WMV (7.95 MB, 228 views)
__________________
"I..am...the enemy!"
Reply With Quote