Quote:
Originally Posted by crispus
Sorry, but I can't agree with you and my other worthy colleagues, at least not entirely. If you look back at posts the thread's originator, hemo101, has made and thanked, you'll see that "nude in public" as a genre is part of what appeals to her. Of course, professional and pay-site/watermarked pictures aren't allowed, and the moderators can deal with that, but it's the "Only One Naked" thread after all!
|
I would have to agree with you, crispus. I don't see anything wrong with "nude in public" photos as long as they fit the theme of "Only One Naked." Part of the problem with the one-sided nudity genre is that not everybody agrees what fits in and what doesn't. I think for something which is not as widely available as people might first imagine, you have to take what you can get with it and that includes some images which are somewhere on the periphery of what you want to see.
But, as long as as we're taking a count of who wants to see what in this thread, I personally am still interested in "nude in public" pics as long as 1) the girl is nude, which means that clothes are actually completely absent from her body and she's not just flashing the camera, although shoes are generally okay and 2) she's the only one naked in a situation where that would be unexpected or unusual. Also, "posed" as opposed to "candid" pics are fine with me.
Just my thoughts on the subject.
johnnycancer