Thread: Only One Naked
View Single Post
  #540  
Old 04-23-2010, 02:37 PM
crispus crispus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9,687
Thanks: 54,975
Thanked 286,836 Times in 9,713 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkmlyx View Post
Please don't let this thread turn into another one of those "nude in public" style threads. I'm talking about photos in which some woman paid to walk nude in public is shown. They are good pictures but there are many threads devoted to that subject anyway. Previosly this thread was more about candid pictures of "only one nude woman at the beach" or "only one nude girl at a house party" kind of stuff. And that was good!

Thanks for all contributions anyway.
Sorry, but I can't agree with you and my other worthy colleagues, at least not entirely. If you look back at posts the thread's originator, hemo101, has made and thanked, you'll see that "nude in public" as a genre is part of what appeals to her. Of course, professional and pay-site/watermarked pictures aren't allowed, and the moderators can deal with that, but it's the "Only One Naked" thread after all! That said, however, I'd agree that many recent posts ARE off-topic, primarily because there are lots featuring flashes (thus not remaining naked) or pictures which, although they may only only SHOW one naked woman, are from events like WNBR, Fremont, or Bay to Breakers, where in fact there are MANY naked woman together at once, often just out of frame. Here, then, are a sampling I chose to encompass what, if I may presume to speak for her, hemo101 thought the thread should include; I apologize for any reposts, trusting at least that they're not too recent.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	109390138.jpg
Views:	2011
Size:	287.8 KB
ID:	2066349   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2139-1.jpg
Views:	3554
Size:	425.6 KB
ID:	2066357  

Click image for larger version

Name:	17632409FpQ.jpg
Views:	2958
Size:	81.8 KB
ID:	2066358   Click image for larger version

Name:	126135295.jpg
Views:	2189
Size:	72.5 KB
ID:	2066359  

Click image for larger version

Name:	124515127.jpg
Views:	1294
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	2066360   Click image for larger version

Name:	1090811414.jpg
Views:	1795
Size:	47.8 KB
ID:	2066361  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2686.JPG
Views:	990
Size:	437.5 KB
ID:	2066363   Click image for larger version

Name:	1787679971.jpg
Views:	2085
Size:	129.8 KB
ID:	2066364  

Click image for larger version

Name:	17328191Uwr.jpg
Views:	2359
Size:	78.9 KB
ID:	2066365   Click image for larger version

Name:	4132968501_152d0df5a1_o.jpg
Views:	2731
Size:	61.5 KB
ID:	2066366  

Reply With Quote
The Following 97 Users Say Thank You to crispus For This Useful Post:
1234xh, 682016, 8nman, abastorke, akivion, alphatier, annacondom, baddaddy, baliston, batteryacid99, beem530i, blurb, Blythe, boster, brinkui, captkerp, carlos7811, cerolapi, Cflaguy, chembr0sia, dakotaboy, dandd, darklord14, devi88, dokkie4, dollydan, DRDavenport, e32100, Elias6330, endoftheline, firstwnat, freebeaches, Frspanko, ginocop, Groan, gs500e91, hal555, hanksnow, hyperion00, jackqx4, jaguary, jjigotcha, johnnycancer, jsjay, juangar, karp, kayser05, kobudo1981, lastdon, lonnewolf019, LOON, loopey, madahab, Marlboro_64, mike_nue, mnadal30, mor847, mrone, nackter_nudist, nevergivenaname, nitro, nudieman, Okko, old jer, oleg305, pascalinepascal, pithaw, Playmore74, punkned, quietones, quivver, radioguts, ralph49, rdstrkr, rebus17, riversidebob, rlawonly, Romerales, ronnie_isit, rr9281, Sandgroper, Sandlapper, santoslm, smovbuf, specs47, spectator, sylgag, testme97, thezipster, thredkamel, tiptopjoker, toenail, TosunPasha, Trea, trinpar, WESON66, zarh