Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan5000
First time poster:
Klondike, those two babes appear to be in porn. See this link to an Australian magazine:
(http) staging.picturemag.com/index.php?option=com_weblinks&catid=17&Itemid=50
I can't post the full link because I'm new.
The black haired woman appears to be on the cover of the mag in the top right picture.
|
Dugan, the sleeve tattoo design on the brunette in the thumbnail you linked appears different than in the Tunick shoot above. Specifically, it's more filled-in in the Tunick photos. It's possible it's the same girl and that she had altered/added to her tattoo between shoots, or it's a different girl. Since the link you provided is just a thumbnail, it's tough to tell. Since there are a ton of girls out there with black hair and sleeve tattoos, I wouldn't bet the farm on it.
At the moment I'd err on the side of saying this is much ado about nothing, and that they're just two more girls participating in the shoot, albeit a bit different from what we're used to seeing at these things. When you break it down, what makes them stand out? I think we're throw off a bit just because they're tan and fit, unlike a lot of the arty girls we're used to seeing. Who knows, maybe theyr'e strippers. Can't strippers like art too?
However, there are a couple other things pointing to the possibility they could indeed be budding adult starlets out for exposure. Let's not forget they also appeared in a cap above from the morning TV show (of which I'm still waiting for the video), so perhaps they were planted there in advance for just that purpose. I mean, how many women out there would be willing to appear naked--albeit censored--live on a national program? So maybe we have a bit of mainstream and adult media synergy.
On the flipside, are the two possibilities mutually exclusive? Maybe they are involved in the adult industry (even just as strippers or whatever) but they still just wanted to participate in the shoot for its own sake, not as a publicity ploy? If it were a publicity stunt, wouldn't a search of the internet yield some results? I searched every possible combination of search terms and nothing came up to indicate any porn star(let) was involved in the Sydney shoot. If it were done for the sake of exposure, then by definition wouldn't we know about it? So maybe everyone's right and it's just a weird well-intended collision of the porn and art worlds.