Quote:
Originally Posted by fango44
No. The deleted thread was about a specific production and an attempt to record it. The new thread is about the play in general.
|
Actually, the new thread is about the same specific production, and a description of it, from a spectator, which makes me consider it basically the same subject. I can see why the old thread was deleted though, I was actually typing a reply to it when it disappeared so I see what you mean.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by showoffzzz
If you found a thread here posted by some other member and discovered they were pics of your younger sister who was sucking her ex bf's dick you'd probably want them removed and we'd do it and then your opinion would be totally different.
|
Actually, my opinon wouldn't be different (although I would be surprised to discover I had a younger sister...
). My point was that IMO the creator of the thread shouldn't be treated differently than any other poster with regards to removal of content. If anybody sees a thread that they feel is problematic, they should be able to ask for its removal, for instance if the content is something like you mention. That also includes the creator of the thread, of course, but I don't think he should have more to say than other posters. Everybody should be able to have their own posts deleted, though, and if the thread's only content comes from the thread creator, then the thread should be deleted, but if others have contributed too (for instance in a "post your wife"-thread), then only the specific posts should be deleted.
This is, from what I read, also consistent with the policy here, but the way it was presented it seemed that any thread could be closed at the whim of the thread starter, which seemed excessive.