Hey all, good response so far. Some of you are paying a lot of attention to this!
In response to at least 2 claims that known1.jpeg and known2.jpeg are not the same person. I must acknowledge that after reviewing my sources, it is possible that 'known2' may indeed not be the same person as 'known1'.
I have submitted two other photographs for examination, I do however insist the veracity of these are almost beyond reproach. Both are posed shots.
known3 was almost certainly taken in the last 12 months. The image is thumbnail sized and there is no better resolution available.
known4 is from around 2004, is most likely a scanned copy of a printed photograph.
Both are most recent than 'known1' - so if you have to discount a photographs. I'd rather discount known1 in favor of these two new photographs. The age difference in subject between known1 and mysterywoman could lead to incorrect conclusion.
Its not much to work with, but can you folks compare these against mysterywoman please.
I also have another piece of information in the metadata of the mysterywoman file. The original photograph was taken using a 'Concord 2000' camera made by Concord corporation. Is this a make of camera found exclusively in one region of the world? Of course, cameras can be transported internationally too...