[Cigar4u]

The DT video 599 would have been a perfect example of CFNF wrestling exept they deviated from the CFNF theme and the description misleads the reader. It actually is a nude vs. nude video in disguise.

The winning wrestler in this video is Christine Dupree, a veteran fetish wrestler who has made numerous videos for a lot of companies. She is sort of a pioneer in the sport by being one of the first women to do videos where she attacks her opponent’s privates and pulls on their pubic hairs.

For many years from the 1950s through the 1980s the attacking of another woman’s boobs and crotch in wrestling videos was taboo. In only recent years have the women wrestlers, directors, producers, etc. found a way to target such areas that is not painful yet looks somewhat believable.

For example, one of my favorite wrestlers, Santana, is really good at twisting boobs – she really sells it – but in reality she is not really doing it. She simply moves her hands over her opponent’s breasts and gives the illusion that she is twisting nipples or boobs while her opponent throws her head back and screams like her mams are being ripped off. If you play it in slow motion you’ll see what I mean.

Christine, on the other hand, is really good at – for lack of a better term – “weeding the garden.” She really makes it look like she is tearing out another woman’s pubic hair. There is a DT video she did with Lisa Comshaw that I understand focuses on fully clothed Christine attacking naked Lisa’s pubes. I also plan to buy that one in the near future.

But, back to the Christine vs. Tanya match.

I too planned to purchase that video until I saw other photos of that match posted on Yahoo Groops and other web sites.

What you don’t see in the DT photo is that Tanya early on in the fight ripped Christina’s leotard from her chest to her crotch, exposing everything Christine has to offer. And the former Penthouse Pet is nicely endowed. Christine retaliates by stripping Tanya naked. While Christine remains in her leotard throughout the fight, it is in tatters and does not cover anything but her legs, arms and backside.

(I do not know why Christine wears an eye patch in this video. She is not blind in that eye. I guess the producers thought it somehow would make her look sexier. In a way, it does. It works for me.)

From the other photos I have seen, it appararently is a one-sided match with Tanya offering little or no effective defense other than tearing Christina’s suit. Also from the photos there apparently is one scene where Christina hangs Tanya by one of her boots from the top turnbuckle – in wrestling it’s called a “tree of woe” – and punishes her by stomping on her. Some folks are really into that form of trampling.

Again, I think the producers or director, in their misguided belief that men and women want to see both combatants nude, made a big mistake here. They had the opportunity to make a classic CFNF wrestling match and surrendered to a decades’ old stereotype requiring both women to be equally clad or unclad.

Christine had posed nude in men’s matgazines and has been naked a lot on film. There is enough nude material on her out there. Given the way she domnated this fight, she really should not have been even partially nude.

There is some consolation here, however, in that this is one of the few female wrestling videos where there is a referee – a third girl – Stacy, who I understand remains clothed in her stirped shirt, shorts and shoes throughout the fight. So, in effect, you have a video with one woman fully clothed, another semi-nude and a third gal nude.

As for the Candi video from which you posted photos, yes, Greeneyes makes sense. Candi has done a lot of work for that company.

Greeneyes is owned by former wrestler Joan Wise, who seemingly has been in the business forever. As a result, she rarely drifts from the standard stuff dating back to the ‘70s.

But I like Greeneyes because it, in effect, launched the career of one of my favorite performers Bunny Glamazon, a six-foot-tall blond stripper with huge boobs who does a lot of domination wrestling stuff, but, as of yet, no CFNF or CFNM material. That’s a pity because she has done a number of one-sided matches, declining for whatever reason to denude her helpless opponents in the end.

Greeneyes does very little CFNF material. The best stuff is probably their nude female vs. nude male matches with the women emerging victorious. They also produce female on female clothed vs. clothed, nude vs. nude and, of course, the very popular topless vs. topless matches.

Because of Greeneyes’ track record I wouldn’t be surprised if the big black woman later in the video strips herself naked for no good reason and continues dominating a nude Candi. I don’t know if that happens, I am just saying I wouldn’t be surprised. Before purchasing the video it would be worth inquiring from the company or a person who has purchased the video if it is CFNF throughout.

That brings up another subject – I have found, like Frrio has, that these companies are approachable.
I once called Women’s World in Florida and the owner answered the phone. I introduced myself and, even though I had purchased only three videos at that point, he knew exactly who I was and pretty much what I had bought previously. I was impressed about how much he cared about his customers.

I called to ask about a particular match that I had purchased in a compilation tape featuring the endings of matches, when the stripping of one woman usually occurrs. The match featured a small blond named Shannon whose bikini was pulled off by a tall barefooted redhead in a black leather suit. I could not find it in their catalogue. He told me the number of the video and described the other two matches in it.

The video actually was a three-part story in which the big redhead dominated Shanon, then another small blond named Nikki in a wrestling ring. In the third segment, the redhead, wearing a bikini, took on both bikini-clad Shannon and Nikki, who turned the tables by beating and stripping the redhead.

Although I did not wind up buying that tape, I did purchase another compilation tape that featured the end of the third segment – again, the owner told me I could find the finish of that match on that tape, which was really the only part of the match I cared to see.

So, if you have questions about a particular video, it wouldn’t hurt to place a long distance call to the company and simply ask them about it before making a disappointing purchase.

As for writing a Kennedy vs. Monroe fantasy match, I might just give it a try. If I write it I’ll post it to a new thread.
Helen, as you probably know, the trouble with writing stories is you sometimes get disappointed that people do not respond the way you want them to. You leave yourself open for ridicule and disappointment – or even worse, apathy.

This forum, I have found, is really photo-driven. Take this thread, for example. Most of the comments and “thanks” have gone to you for posting the thumbnails of the Candi fight, not for my long-winded postings. Quite frankly I’m surprised that no one has attacked me with nasty comments for being verbose, which can sometimes happen on forums.

Also, I recently posted a lengthy four-part story to a ballbusting forum called femaledom.com. It took me a week to write it and it was full of nearly every fetish of that genre – CFNM, female on male ballbusting, wrestling, etc. I got maybe six responses from the more than 1,700 people who read the four installments. Although they generally were positive reviews of the piece, the overall response was so small that, in the final analysis, I felt it was not worth having written or posted it.

Before I write a story, I’d like to know if there is a significant demand for it.

Frrio what is the other video you had DT produce for you? Was it ever released to the public? You may say it was a flop, but others might not think so. Your Bare Bottom Battering video would have been just the thing I was looking for had the victorious girl not been topless. Still, from the description, it seems like a real solid video, especially for bare-bottom spanking fans.