[quote=hedomindcr;414840]Interest in this thread seems to be waning! Thought it would be popular, but maybe I was wrong!
[/ quote]
please keep posting, these are the best.
no doubt in my mind these are 100% authentic. too much variation, too much imperfection. the location moves around, the lighting sucks, few of the women have really perfect bodies, the angles are really unflattering (all women look extra curvy from down there), very few are shaven or trimmed, some - a reasonable proportion - have tampon strings or pads in their underwear. and the camera work is shaky and furtive, but motivated to get the "good bits" and sometimes gets it, but often not. and the women are young, old, normal, pudgy, hot, etc, not fitting a "type" you usually see from a setup (except they are all white from what i've seen). and there's a persistent video artifact where a "professional" production would have bought a new camera.
british - could be, it would be consistent with the variety of faces. french? i doubt it - i would expect nicer clothes and underthings. it's also totally different than japanese lockerroom bag cam setups or the russian beach cabin stuff, both of which probably benefit from the protection provided by organized crime - this is real voyeur with the risk of getting caught.
maybe what this thread is missing is caps. here are some from the round since my last post. you keep posting, i'll keep capping.