Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomkat2
She's fantastic! Girls back then were so naturally beautiful with no tats or piercings where they don't belong. This beauty must have been so desired by by so many. It's also cool that she was so free to share her nudity to the camera lens when it was pre-digital and they probably had to have film developed in a film lab. Imagine how exciting it was for the film developing guy to see!
|
No tattoo’s no piercings, and full bush.
Those were the days if a girl allowed you to photograph her she would ask , don’t you have to get these developed.
The great lies were oh I have a dark room in my basement, or I have a special lab I take them to this lady friend of mine.
My wife’s photos that I share in my early posts were all slides.
I would send them off to Kodak to develop for I wanted the best developing possible.
She did not care if some stranger saw them, of course it was pre internet.
There were stories that they might confiscate them of deemed porn but that never happened.
She did not want me taking them to the local Photo-mat in the parking lot of the local shopping center.
I has a friend that worked at one of those, he said when board he would go through photos.
He claimed more than once he rubbed one off while working, imagine being upper teens or early twenty’s.
He said the best is photos were picked up and the very women in the photos was getting them.