View Single Post
  #1249  
Old 06-06-2025, 06:11 PM
maxdelmax's Avatar
maxdelmax maxdelmax is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Del Mar, CA
Posts: 1,415
Thanks: 5,271
Thanked 46,330 Times in 1,557 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burger1701 View Post
So what do we do then. Wait for some indeterminate length of time till someone suddenly decides that we can start recording again. Because by then people will have forgotten the internet exists and that recordings can end up online.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raiedefesse View Post
Yeah, but that's also what makes the nude photos 100x more hot. Like Joanna for instance. Seeing her naked but also in skirt, hose, and boots...that just really does it for me.
I thought we sorted this out a couple of years ago. Posting images of women naked at a public event is obviously what this forum is all about. Posting pictures of them dressing/undressing at the same public event is also fair game. But using PimEyes to find their wedding, graduation and work photos, and then connecting it with their public nudity images seems over the top. Especially when many of the pictures are found by using the information to scour their FB and IG accounts.

These women volunteered to be naked in public and I'm sure they were also aware that they would be photographed; but I don't believe most signed up for this to happen to them. Others have pointed out that this can discourage many women from participating, or at least repeating, when they inevitably find out about this activity. But more than that it seems invasive and a little cruel.

I get the appeal of seeing these women undressed and dressed, and it's definitely easy to use reverse image search and PimEyes to do this. What I don't get it the need to make these findings public. OCC isn't some private club as the images shared here very quickly get spread all across the internet.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	7482811576_1ce150aa82_o.jpg
Views:	315
Size:	1,004.5 KB
ID:	14398913   Click image for larger version

Name:	7482820934_e053e79e88_o.jpg
Views:	184
Size:	4.46 MB
ID:	14398914  

Click image for larger version

Name:	7482822160_d0cced1184_o.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	1.94 MB
ID:	14398915   Click image for larger version

Name:	7482823078_b9bbba9cec_o.jpg
Views:	224
Size:	4.06 MB
ID:	14398916  

Click image for larger version

Name:	7482823924_d1a644589c_o.jpg
Views:	229
Size:	3.90 MB
ID:	14398917   Click image for larger version

Name:	7482825456_95a95c8dc7_o.jpg
Views:	252
Size:	3.50 MB
ID:	14398918  

Click image for larger version

Name:	7482826214_1c15e49776_o.jpg
Views:	772
Size:	874.9 KB
ID:	14398919  
__________________
Missed it by that much!
Reply With Quote
The Following 76 Users Say Thank You to maxdelmax For This Useful Post:
audebon2, ausguy, BaconBot, bcxq843, bobbyqq, brunettesrule, CarryOn321, Chicxulub, chrisscross, cleanpenguin, colascne1, DC2k9, dd11aa, diamond59131, dragon14, dryerfryer, entertainingcat, exloverboy, FEVEHN, ffee443, fitne, Flam1ng0, flanker7, FunkyVoyeur, g.stegmans, gergera, ghostrider_ghostlead, graeno, ham268, hamish97, HCharles.Crank, Henritheninth, heymrfingers, Iamsailing, Isaak Sellenraa, kaiserlee, krashcdm, krullbagge, laylak, littlep, lnp1947, lonemeat, ludovician, luechow, m4x9123, maddock, mcflyfly, meinoernst, mossycleft, nestorkaka, Nocturnal Terror, occ9, patrick85, peterd_, real2, remlav, retrac55, riverstyx, robot555, ronnie_isit, schlubby, shlugeen, sillyjoe, SimonTabs, slimshot3, smartin15, spectre14, srode, sserena, sturkapsturkap, uppa87, vmack77, waliant, who_me2, wtkxfc, zacster