View Single Post
  #29  
Old 02-28-2025, 01:38 PM
Gee_Star's Avatar
Gee_Star Gee_Star is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,261
Thanks: 3,850
Thanked 33,049 Times in 2,228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fango View Post
That thread was deleted a year-and-a-half ago (surprised you even remember it) by someone who's no longer a Moderator here. No reason was given for the deletion.

I feel like I should say at this point: we are not trying to actively encourage the posting of any AI photos, even enhanced ones. Having an entire thread on the topic of AI-altered images is something that would be frowned upon here, I think. If they turn up from time to time for a specific purpose, I think that would be OK. But otherwise, it's probably best not to start entire threads dedicated to them.

Fango
Understood

Going forward, I will use A.I. upscaling for the fake magazine covers only. The raw nature of everyday, relatable women on film or very early digital footage is a part of the appeal here. It makes no sense to have them looking like over, airbrushed Playboy models.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gee_Star For This Useful Post: