[thefergieferg1]

AI Generated Images.- Posted after consulting a moderator but please advise if OK

As we all know AI Generated Images are appearing more and more on OCC even though they are banned here.
If you are someone who does this deliberately then this post isn't for you but rather aimed at the users who are disappointed at having AI images removed when they posted them in good faith or anyone who want clues on how to spot them.

First a couple of points.

I don't claim to be an expert in AI, just giving a few pointers on things I've noticed. It's by no means fool proof and I've downloaded images for my albums only realise they were AI on closer inspection. It's probably happened more times than I realised and in truth it's pretty impossible to be sure with some of them.

This is not about AI editing software which is used to improve picture quality of existing images. It is about AI Images generated from scratch by software.
As such they are not subject to copyright law as its stands but it's still being argued over in some places.

I will not get into any discussion any Software or methodology here or in PMs, this is solely to help identify such images.
It maybe that some quirks are software specific and you may find other common features not mentioned here.

The following are Examples of AI images so here goes with a few comments on each. (NUMBERED IMAGES BELOW)

Ex1 Not bad at first glance and if I didn't know I couldn't be sure but the first thing is breast symmetry. The other thing that seems common, is a well defined clavicle. I guess this is due the modelling.

Ex2 Again breasts a bit too perfect, It's supposed to look like a model shoot but the lighting isn't that good. Looks like a single direct flash rather than multiple. (you can often see the double flash relected in the models eyes. Navel piercing looks wrong.

Ex3 The prompt here included something like "1960's woman" so the head hair is adjusted but the public hair is a modern trim. Look at the hands. AI doesn't do hands very well and they are often elongated or bony. Sometimes they are completely mangled and 6 fingers is not uncommon! Something else comes into play here, the background. The will have various backgrounds such as rooms, beach, forests etc but after looking at few pics I thought they all had a similar look. Difficult to explain but maybe sterile, bland?

Ex4 I brightened and upscaled this for a better look. You get the idea now so I'll shorten the comments. - Wonky hand, similar pubes, right nipple a bit off. Background.

Ex5 You might fall for this one if the left hand was cropped out. I'm also not sure about the nipples.

Ex6 You might just take this as a very athletic body but the hands aren't right. Off-the-shelf pubes again.

Ex7 Curvy "Real" woman except the nipples are a giveaway. Pubes don't seem to suit her and hands not great again. The beach different, but the same.

Ex8 I brightened this one and looks Ok at first glance but I'm sure what happening with the navel and that clavicle doesn't seem to match the rest of her. Background.

Ex9 Another I might pass over but they seem to want to have navel piercings but it does appear properly. There seems to be some ghosting around her nipples and again the clavicle seems wrong for her body.

Ex10 I did this one with Jeans and Tits thread in mind. Nipples, Navel and Background.

Although I've dealt with specifics it is sometimes it's just developing an instinct for when something isn't right. If you google something like " AI Nudes" and look at Images with the filter off, you will see lots AI images including a load of Celebs but the first image to catch you eye will be a real photo because it's different.

Of course another thing that makes life more difficult is the the use of phones and tablets.

Well I hope this helps along the way but I fear it's a losing battle.
Mods hope this is OK, if not feel free do do whatever.

Ferg


Images