View Single Post
  #800  
Old 12-27-2023, 12:37 PM
HCharles.Crank's Avatar
HCharles.Crank HCharles.Crank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 878
Thanks: 4,601
Thanked 19,733 Times in 859 Posts
Default I hear what you’re saying

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUB2 View Post
1. This ain't porn and nothing to be ashamed of
2. It's for a good cause
3. An employer would more likely to fire someone for saying men aren't women, or vise versa
4. Google is fully censored and gov't controlled now, so adult sites are de-listed
5. Facial recognition (PimEyes) is so costly that only OSINT professionals subscribe there
But it’s absolutely true that the only possible outcome is for it to deter female riders…whether that’s a lot or insignificant it’s absolutely a deterrent. It’s certainly not HELPING girls to feel safe to ride. I don’t think it’s a question of morality but I do think it’s like the marshmallow question: do you want the clothed pictures now if it means less riders in future or can you stay off that in hopes that girls don’t feel outed and so will continue to ride: if even one finds out in a given city, she’s damn sure gonna spread the word, period
__________________
Check out my albums of the Fremont solstice parade:
https://forum.oneclickchicks.com/album.php?u=702746:
I’m slooooowly working through each year, girl by girl. I’d guess I’m covering over 80% of the riders easily.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to HCharles.Crank For This Useful Post: