Thread: Underwear Ads
View Single Post
  #1681  
Old 04-08-2023, 05:26 PM
lonmol's Avatar
lonmol lonmol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,105
Thanks: 16,480
Thanked 270,814 Times in 15,821 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FLP00 View Post
True that! That's yet another reminder of my aging though.

I couldn't help but notice you've just posted textbook examples of the three things that made high-cuts the sexiest underwear ever. If I had to explain to younger guys why these were amazing it'd be;

Exhibit 1, left: making women's legs look much longer, 'legs-for-days'.

Exhibit 2, center: making women's butts look bigger yet not fat, just kind of 'longer', these panties were often so snug that also gave their bums a lovely 'bubbliness' modern low-cuts fail to achieve.

Exhibit 3, right: enhancing women's waist-to-hip ratio into that sweet 'hornet waist' without looking unnaturally thin.

It seems they've been making sort of a comeback lately, but with smaller seats a la Brazilian bikinis. Lovely, but I prefer the classic 1990s full butt coverage bikini brief much more. I'm just weird like that.
Katie and Laura's satin panties. This company makes hi-cut satin panties, based on the 80's/90's styles, and their models are so beautiful, they make Victoria's Secret look like The Kennel Club.
Attached Thumbnails
Juliet-LuckyGreen-2.jpg   Juliets-2-1.jpg  

Ezk6YtVXIAAE8Ad-1.jpg   Juliet-Hot-Flowers-Hot-3.jpg  

Juliet-Hot-Flowers-Hot-2.jpg   Juliet-Hot-Flowers-Hot-5.jpg  

Ballet-Juliet-4-BlueFlower-8T.jpg   EGeW-l2XoAAIGHf.jpg  

ENrr6CdWwAAl5O8.jpg   Juliet-Essential-8-4.jpg  


Last edited by lonmol; 04-08-2023 at 05:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to lonmol For This Useful Post: