View Single Post
  #24  
Old 01-15-2023, 01:58 AM
ds97 ds97 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 50
Thanks: 339
Thanked 759 Times in 59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ~*ghetto_star*~ View Post
While that image is not bad, it's still quite a step below the A.I. art I posted earlier in the thread and it also goes back to xplondie9's point about wanting to see real women.
Yet, more fappable, if you ask me
If the work is done well, I don't care if it's a fake. That's why one solution of regulating could be a thread with watermarked generated images, where improvement suggestions can be made to get rid of the "uncanny" effects (btw, please DM me if you see something that should be improved in the posted pic). This also facilitates identifying A.I. generated art in a later stage, as we may trace back any wrongly non-watermarked A.I. generated image to posts in the A.I. improvement thread - and those who still post these A.I. images without watermark may be banned for life after one warning (with or without OCC pass). Just one suggestion among many.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ds97 For This Useful Post: